LLM suppliers should offer PR scoped ephemeral keys
LLMs make PRs cheaper to create than to review (many to one relationship).In my case, as a repo maintainer, I usually run my prompts and workflow to review a lot of the code that comes in, and I end up paying for every unsolicited PR.I was wondering: why don't LLM suppliers support ephemeral, PR-scoped usage keys funded by the contributor? Like a review bond.For example: usable only by the...