News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

liggitt

Re:What Would C. S. Lewis Have Thought of AI? on Friday June 26, 2026 @10:00AM (#48686741)
I've always thought this Lewis quote was particularly apt:

"But in general, take my advice, when you meet anything that’s going to be human and isn’t yet, or used to be human once and isn’t now, or ought to be human and isn’t, you keep your eyes on it and feel for your hatchet."

(Mr. Beaver, on the White Witch, from "The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe")

Re:No Code on Friday October 31, 2025 @01:04AM (#45768603)
That brings back memories... https://github.com/kelseyhightower/nocode/issues/3#issuecomm... was one of my favorites
Re:A skeptic's first contact with Kubernetes on Thursday August 01, 2024 @09:20PM (#41135299)
The motivation is more the latter, but it's not at all clear the proposed removal of the embedded kustomize will proceed, given the compatibility implications. See discussion at https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/4706#issue... and following.
Re:Go 1.21 Released on Tuesday August 08, 2023 @02:56PM (#37053805)
> if I may ask for an addition in go 1.22: encoding/yaml

FYI, encoding/yaml was recently requested, and was declined in https://github.com/golang/go/issues/61023#issuecomment-16106..., for reasons I largely agree with.

(I work for Google but not on Go)

Re:How to start a Go project in 2023 on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @01:44PM (#36061600)
That's just one possible reason. The disclaimer does not specify all the possible reasons the proxy would drop a saved version. Treating it more like a cache seems appropriate.
Re:How to start a Go project in 2023 on Tuesday May 23, 2023 @10:53PM (#36053511)
That's explicitly not guaranteed. From https://proxy.golang.org:

> Why did a previously available module become unavailable in the mirror? > > proxy.golang.org does not save all modules forever. There are a number of reasons for this…

(I am a googler, but don't work on the go team – my opinions that projects should vendor and actually review their dependencies are my own)

Re:Tech talks don’t have to be boring on Friday March 11, 2022 @02:39PM (#30645005)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlPaby7suOc&t=13s is a fantastic parody talk, and this is one of my favorite moments of it
Laggy loading of items into a tappable target area is begging to be called the “slow poke” pattern
I want to see the study on the impact of novice developers on senior developers' sleep deprivation
Re:Kubernetes 1.7 with Tim Hockin [audio] on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @11:58PM (#14916864)
If you decide to run with the RBAC authorizer, tools like kubeadm run the control plane components with credentials that have the required permissions out of the box. If you're using your own deployment/setup, you'll want to consult https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/rbac/#core-co... to either give standard user/group names to your components, or grant the appropriate roles to custom user/group names.

Once your control plane is running, granting API access to other apps that need it is typically a matter of creating a service account, setting that service account in the pod spec, and granting the service account a role with sufficient access. See https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/rbac/#service...

Finally, if you're upgrading an existing cluster, and want to turn on RBAC authorization, there are tips at https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/rbac/#upgradi... for easing the transition.