libeclipse

Why don't we use hybrid RSA and ECC then? Or hybrid AES and ChaCha20?

Software bugs is a weak argument for a new hybrid standard, and doesn't justify the additional complexity.

Bro thinks cloning a repo means you're already compromised

> Only one generation stuck out to me. Simply asking it to make it look like a Qt app - to my tasteless eyes - removed almost all feeling of slop. You can check some of the results out [here](https://envs.net/~volpe/projects/ai-design.html).

All of these examples sites are broken on mobile for me.

It looks like an AI generated idea and execution. I believe the README is meaningless words pretending to mean something

Why not just change the nonce instead of appending it and save some space

Innovative how? Many travel routers already exist and support similar features

You don't need NixOS to use Nix as a package manager/build system

They didn't block anyone. They're making a mockery of Chinese censors. It's a political and satirical act.

Chinese censors use active probing to scrape hosts and block anything with problematic content or services. It's not just DPI based.

They're exaggerating. It's a very casual insult, often used playfully

The sample size is miniscule (14)

It would tell you that the system is inconsistent

Did you see the authors of the paper?

Bro thinks handing a majoritarian government unlimited, unchecked power is the solution lol

Democracy breaks when power is concentrated.

The marginal cost of digital goods tends to be low

A bigger issue is that anyone with a VPN can access the discount

It is back, yes

That's literally not what they said

Why do you assume that? The Uber competitor is a huge company

What? You think food retains harmful radiation after it comes out of the microwave?

No mention of security

Microwaves are non-ionising radiation

The GitHub page said it would take 2% but actually took 30%. How is that "exactly as it says it would"?

Title was very badly massacred

That's not plausible

> Reading by the ambient light emitted is constantly exchanging photons, which is information communication.

Wrong. You don't emit photons

> Picking up a fallen coin is displacing localized complexity.

That's a meaningless statement

> Again, pedantically deconstructing a technical analogy to dismiss it on its merits is going to be hard when faced with a more pedantic pissant.

It's an analogy that doesn't work, picking apart the differences is revealing

> The point of the entire exercise is to acknowledge the collective vs individual contributions to the emergent tragedy of the commons.

Another meaningless statement

> anyone interacting with the electromagnetic field that you haphazardly allow to escape the privacy of your residence is within their rights to do so

You seem to have an insufficient understanding of how wireless communication protocols work, in particular the 'communication' aspect. Simply detecting the signal would not allow you to use the WiFi network. You would have to establish a connection with the access point and actively and continuously exchange information with it, thereby directly using its resources.

This is not the same as coming across a fallen coin in the street, or reading by ambient light emitted by someone else's candle

This is completely unrelated to the topic of the post

Most of your comment is simply not true

That's a myopic view to take, this hurts users way more than it hurts Mozilla