ledude
in this particular case, there's an identity theft charge for submitting the invalid subpoena to the bank with the judge's information and an attempted identity theft charge for trying (and not succeeding) to access the judge's banking information.
count 3 is the false statement charge, not 2. this isn't a civil defamation case. what the defendant knew is irrelevant.
your last statement is wrong.
the full indictment is here: http://pickens.fetchyournews.com/2016/06/24/fannin-focus-pub...
these two were indicted for trying to obtain a judge's banking records and violating the notification statute in georgia.
that stuate is written in plain and simple language that most will understand; refer to (b): http://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-7/chapter-1/e...
please please... please... do more research before blindly believing every david vs. goliath story...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takeover http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/takeover.asp
should we also whitewash all of history's tragedies?
this should be killed by a federal court very fast
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_R... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause
this is a heavy article to begin with. i got frustrated with the horrid design before i got half way through and copied it into text editor without any styles
the layout and color choices of this page make reading this unbearable.. they're distracting, annoying, and infuriating at the same time. please... for readers' sake.. stop designing pages like this.