leahey
Texas’ New EV Tax Should Fix the Bridges, Not ‘Own the Libs’
Crypto Mining Electricity Excise Tax Should Target AI Instead
Oakland A’s Move to Vegas Is Costly Gamble for Nevada Taxpayers
Catering to Tax Evaders Is a Poor Prescription for Bank Health
Maximum Minimum Competence – What Is Chevron Deference?
Lawstodon – A Directory for Legal Professionals in the Fediverse
Its not a personal site, per se, but its my YouTube page for my family's little cabin videos and trail cams. Love making them and its the one consistent thing I do, other than walk my dog, that makes me happy.
Remote: yes
Willing to relocate: No
Resume/CV: http://andrew.legal top left link
Email: Andrew [at] Leahey.org
Attorney (NJ/PA barred in US) specializing in tax and technology. Looking for part time/contract gigs or just opportunities to weigh-in/help.
If its for an issue that is niche, you should see if they have published in the area in question. Gives you a decent indication of their standing in that field.
The good news/bad news reality is Alexander is looking for a big payday after years in government service -- not assist the government is using Amazon for its own surveillance purposes, or assist Amazon in becoming better at surveillance.
I thought this was about the expectations of a user on here? Now its about ethics? You must have strong legs to do all this jumping. You should try just saying what you mean the first time.
Edit: I'll put a bow on it for you. You say:
>by that standard they're more alt right than the republicans are.
You are comparing comments made by one individual 40 years ago to where your preferred /party/ falls today. You are doing all of this in response to a question as to what meaningful difference there is between the modern GOP and alt-right.
Forget about the fact that even if Joe Biden literally wore a Klan hood on Inauguration Day 2020 your answer would still not be responsive to the question, you must be able to see the issue in needing to go back 40 years in one individual's public life to find a favorable comparison to your preferred party's current positions.
Seriously. Just stop. You're flailing.
Edit 2: Just saw your other thread where you're defending Rittenhouse in Kenosha. Clear which side of the aisle you fall. We're done here, feel free to have your last word.
But, as you say, the game is to divert attention and dodge the issue -- as illustrated by the fact that you asked for a distinction between the modern GOP and alt-right and our friend here started talking about Biden.
Have. Not your personal researcher.
>...don't conform to expected behavior...
And yet, my initial comment is doing just fine despite your suggestions people flag it. Hmm.
Ask HN: What has been your most confounding interaction with the legal field?
Attorney here.I've just wrapped up a long term project and I'm eyeing the horizon for my next step. I thought I would try to get some feedback from the HN community with regards to pervasive issues at the intersection of law/regulators and your field.By way of example, a project I have been considering for some time is an online resource for patients diagnosed with serious illnesses: forms for...
/s
Speaks much more about where your party is in 2020 than anything else.
They defend Trump at every turn and only hold his feet to the fire for things like “Tweeting too much.” You need only look to the subreddit for the show to see those that fell off over the years owing to their alt right turn. Let’s not pretend this is some accusation you’ve never heard before.
As the other replier said, they constantly and consistently repeated the Obama birtherism nonsense. Now they defend Trump. There is a throughline there, you just don’t want to see it.
Beyond that, and returning to the actual subject at hand, there is very little "deconstruction" -- to the extent that is a thing, in the show. Perhaps in the early days. It has long since devolved in to a Trump apologist show, regurgitating Fox News and Breitbart talking points. You need only look to see where else Curry has appeared.