kv85s
kv85s on Hacker News
Boy, did this not age well
Are there any real-world, production systems based on JavaScript and Python?
Toy systems, yes. Hey, I too, think CircuitPython is really neat. But I'm skeptical someone would base a PLC (or similar) on it.
CNN: breathlessly reporting in 2022, stuff we all knew in 1991
MS-DOS user experience was extremely similar CP/M. In fact, one could safely say MS-DOS/PC-DOS only existed in the first place as a "quick and dirty" approximation of CP/M. (because IBM and Digital Research could not agree to licensing terms to bring CP/M to the IBM PC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Research#CP/M-86_and_D...
"For the Pro computer, that new case design helps the new Pro get “about 20 percent more airflow” compared to the Power Mac G5 that precedes it."
I lost any respect for the writer with that sentence.
Posted by
kv85s on Wednesday February 13, 2019 @02:10PM
from the hackaday.com dept.
You could call it "GeoCities"
Why expect any city to become another?
Key being the word "successful":
- learned things at their previous founding attempt/s
- serial entrepreneurs probably have their act together
Simple greed? As in: "play ball, and you get access to the gigantic Chinese market"
Suggest adding a [2009] tag to let people know from whence this wonderful paper dates.
-1 for voluntarily moving onto the Google plantation.
In no part of heaven is there a monthly subscription fee.
In no part of heaven does your data go poof and disappear if some 3rd party company goes under.
In no part of heaven is privacy of your data at the mercy of a 3rd party, that doesn't share your interests.
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Max_Planck
often summarized as "Science advances one funeral at a time."
Posted by
kv85s on Monday February 09, 2015 @12:01PM
from the gizmodo.com dept.
Yes! In fact, this talk first appeared on Google Video, before it all got shunted into youtube (which was an acquisition)
I believe what they're proposing is largely the same, if not identical, to Content-Centric Networking from Xerox PARC.
The central idea is:
Instead of asking one particular server for some content, just ask for the content by name.
Since the content may come from any handy server, it is up to the receiver to validate it is really the content he requested. Nothing about this implies the evil "centralized security model" people are going on about. Sure, some bad actor could weasel it in later, but it's not there now.
SV diversity:
1) workforce is 50% Indian, 50% Chinese.
2) Hiring from both mainland China and Taiwan.
3) hiring from all over India, not just Bangalore.
No, the router still forwards the traffic, but in software rather than hardware. Read the section entitled "Background Information" inside the Cisco document linked at the bottom of the article.
In particular, the telling error message is:
%MLSCEF-DFC4-7-FIB_EXCEPTION: FIB TCAM exception, Some entries will be software switched
"We’re big believers in the value of disaggregation"
-- says the world's biggest data aggregator.
The irony is amazing.
I blame the spineless executives, who peed themselves and folded at the words "this means war". WTF did that hippy salesman Jobs know about war? Oh, you'll go and hurt someone's feelings at a meeting? Give me a F-ing break. That shitbag Jobs wasn't fit to scrape the muck off a real veteran's boot.
i guess it's a better name than GS-11 clock-watchers?
This is very nice work. It should be required reading for Pointy-Haired-Bosses everywhere!
visiting the link yields:
Parse error at (line 1, column 1):
unexpected end of input
expecting reserved word 'module', reserved word 'import' or at least one datatype or variable definition