kubanczyk
Actual models of superdeterminism (e.g. Donadi–Hossenfelder (2022)) seem inelegant and mathematically more complex than MWI. Which doesn't mean it's physically wrong or "weirder than MWI".
That's just your own projection. Both sides adapt, and you haven't heard the other side yet.
Since children turn into adults, and not the other way around, I'd say that children adapt much more than parents.
> Bayesian phylogenetic analyses indicate that intensive agriculture was as likely the result of state formation as its cause. By contrast, grain cultivation most likely preceded state formation.
It seems you hold a much stronger position than the paper you cite. Anyway paper's interesting, thanks.
I feel a straightforward example of exatcly this may be Moriori of Chatham Islands.
Nope, no way to do that.
I wonder about ergonomics. I can imagine "academic" usage, but I shudder at the perspective of the impact on a typical CRUD app.
Ah, so you haven't looked into json/v2 yet.
Seeing the usual HN hate on Duolingo specifically, I wonder whether it's blind. I might have missed scientific research about it causing cancer.
As a frog would say: at least the heat is separate from water, for now.
Look for `NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath` if you want to learn about Windows.
I'm atomic, FWIW.
> how having nuclear power prevents vulnerability to direct attack?
OP alluded to a well-known bonus capability of nuclear power plants: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-239#Production
That's your fantasies, not author's. He merely implied that one can obviously decide whom to allow to fuck one's wife. He hasn't implied that wife's consent is unnecessary or automatic.
> (RFC 1866) specifies that space characters should be encoded as `+` in application/x-www-form-urlencoded content-type key-value pairs (see paragraph 8.2.1, subparagraph 1).
Philosophers may squint at the suffering-in-itself long and hard, but I doubt they'll affect waking/extinguishing empathy of the masses. Exploring the suffering that fails our empathy (e.g. suffering of a wheat plant harvested) seems a highly abstract task; more abstract than high mathematics.
What if there are less libraries? Will LLMs lead to more or less libraries?
Please don't forget to state the axioms before building the proof.
All these did not compare with the sheer effect of capitalism: let's concentrate the production, let's scale it so big that every worker will become a hyper-narrow specialist. You bet it's unsexy take today, but it was universally understood in Lenin's times that it's a path not possible/feasible to withdraw from. That's the one magic ingredient that seems absolutely required.
So, it was an anti-revolutionary policy. Which at that time of history worked as well as an anti-communist policy.
> Unsurprisingly the Soviet Union killed the kulak model and moved to collective farming[0], which was arguably actually communistic.
Soviet Union, whatever it had preached, implemented state capitalism - concentration of the means of production under a single owner.
It's important for me to use words precisely. If somebody implies, for example, that capitalism is the opposite of communism, that's just snatching the words and waving them like banners.
It seems non sequitur. This hypothetical scenario sounds like entrenching capitalism, because it would concentrate capital even more.
It would probably weaken democracy and weaken free market (esp. the job market), yes.
> society will collapse before then because of said breaking of capitalism itself
Or, maybe the society would continue to exist with even more inequality? And, of course, much changed from what it is today.
You validate my feelings. I always knew that at heart.
We have too much code - languages to program machines.
We need a new different language now.
A plan.md, written in what... legalese English? Really? Am I back in 1897? People committing that to vcs, sheesh...