News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

ku5h

The code for this public sandbox is available at https://github.com/synqronlabs/mxraven-demo.

One interesting thing which sets us apart is used for the CLI: a durable NATS JetStream consumer over websockets for clients to fetch all events (delivery attempts, side effects from rules and their actions etc). I built perch https://github.com/synqronlabs/perch, a tiny, single-binary mailbox server backed by mxRaven which can run behind CGNATs and firewalls on consumer devices effortlessly using this.

If you wanna check out what the mxRaven resources the sandbox uses (the listeners for instance) on the dashboard, use the credentials: Username: guest Password: c53A!@3qaMzM

in the workspace 'kush' on https://app.mxraven.com/login in the 'Open Workspace' option.

Show HN: MxRaven – Programmable email infra for nothing in particular

https://sandbox.mxraven.com/

Hi HN, I am Kush, a student founder from India building mxRaven (https://mxraven.com). We recently made it available for public use, you can read my post about our launch here: https://mxraven.com/blog/launching-mxravenmxRaven is a programmable email delivery platform for not any one particular thing, but rather a flexible glue which can be used to build anything that requires receiving or...

( Read More... | 2 comments | 3 points | on HN )
Re:Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged on Friday May 15, 2026 @03:34AM (#48145637)
Because in the software world, especially before 2022, ownership and stability have been valued. People like using things that do not randomly start breaking more often after every new release, and if things break, there is a human who knows exactly why it broke and what's the best way to fix it. Businesses would not want their losses to be attributed to an AI rewriting an entire codebase. AI owns nothing, not even the bugs which it produces. I would not want my SaaS to have downtime because a JavaScript runtime it depends on decided that they had to market their LLM by rewriting years of code recklessly.

People are not betrayed by a rewrite. They are betrayed by an LLM rewriting with minimal supervision fasttracked to a merge within 9 days of commencement.

To the contrary I do not understand how we have become so insensitive towards stability since the LLM era. Why is unbreakable code no longer the goal but a truckload of generated code is.

Ask HN: How to distinguish between concurrent, parallel, sync and async

I have seen all four terms used interchangeably. I know this sounds repeated, but I want a little more specific answer. I have already done my research. I found quite satisfactory results[0] explaining what each term meant. But what is still not clear to me, is how exactly would we differentiate them if we had to represent them through a Venn diagram.My current understanding is the following...

( Read More... | no comments | on HN )