News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

krohling

I think this is a creative approach. I wonder how the success rates for that little RNN compare to the success rates of the primary LLM, especially for complex queries or complex tool calls. At some point you have to scale that network up large enough to get better results. Eventually you've come back around and you might as well use an LLM. I think a similar approach with potentially better results (depends on the application) could be accomplished by using that same dataset to finetune a small language model. It'd be interesting to see some success rate comparisons.
Is it realistic to think that the poors will start their own economy servicing each other? I'm sure there would be chaos and violence for a period but eventually it seems like the path upward would be a whole new economic system for that 98%. This system could even make use of the automation offered by AI.
Re:I am rich and have no idea what to do on Friday January 03, 2025 @11:05AM (#42586782)
Do something to help everyone else stuck in the system. Hire lobbyists to improve healthcare in the US. All the other rich people are just trying to make things worse and extract as much as possible.
Re:Deep Learning in JavaScript on Thursday March 28, 2024 @07:20PM (#39858647)
This is awesome! Congrats. Clearly a lot of work and a very cool library.
Re:Show HN: Deep search of all ML papers on Wednesday January 24, 2024 @01:51PM (#39121182)
"Our AI agent finds precisely what you ask for, 10-50x better than Google Scholar"

I was curious how this was measured since benchmarking accuracy for LLMs is tough. Found this in the paper: "This classification accuracy was benchmarked by manually analyzing over 400 papers across a range of representative searches, and comparing the human evaluation to the language model’s judgment"

I'm skeptical that their dataset of 400 papers with 3 classification labels (highly relevant, closely related, or ignorable) is large enough to represent the diversity of queries they're going to get from users. To be clear, I don't think this undermine's (haha) the value of what they've built, still very cool.

Re:Marc Andreessen Is Wrong About Everything on Thursday October 19, 2023 @10:28PM (#37951673)
"We are told that technology takes our jobs, reduces our wages, increases inequality, threatens our health, ruins the environment, degrades our society, corrupts our children, impairs our humanity, threatens our future, and is ever on the verge of ruining everything."

Ok, fair enough. I wouldn't pin any of these issues on "technology". I lay them at the feet of "businesses" specifically operating within a capitalist landscape. Unfortunately "technology" is tightly coupled to "businesses" in the Western world and I don't think that removing constraints on the latter will benefit anyone except, you know... rich people.

"We believe the techno-capital machine of markets and innovation never ends, but instead spirals continuously upward. Comparative advantage increases specialization and trade. Prices fall, freeing up purchasing power, creating demand. Falling prices benefit everyone who buys goods and services, which is to say everyone. Human wants and needs are endless, and entrepreneurs continuously create new goods and services to satisfy those wants and needs, deploying unlimited numbers of people and machines in the process."

Calls for further doubling down on Capitalism given the dire inequality and our inability to meet even basic needs for so many people in our already rich society strikes me as the utmost expression of societal tone deaf.

Hit me up, I'd love to chat (pun intended)
Thanks, that is definitely on my list. I appreciate the feedback!
I'll take a look into that. Thanks for trying. For what it's worth I don't think he did. If he did they probably weren't very good :)

Show HN: Ask ChatGPT questions about any Website, PDF or Word doc

https://app.conifer.chat

Here's the home page: https://app.conifer.chatI built this example using semantic search + GPT-3 to make files conversational regardless of whether they fit within GPT-3's token limit. Enter a website url or upload a document then just ask for a summarization or any other questions about the document. Behind the scenes the document is parsed and I'm using embeddings to pull out context for...

( Read More... | 6 comments | 2 points | on HN )
Re:Our Reality May Be a Sum of All Possible Realities on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:12AM (#34865468)
Thanks for the kind response. I actually generated that comment by feeding parts of the article into ChatGPT and asking it the previous comment.

If you would like to ask it more things about this article I have it searchable here: https://app.conifer.chat/threads/37321fdc-6a04-4c56-a857-21b...

Re:Our Reality May Be a Sum of All Possible Realities on Sunday February 19, 2023 @10:27PM (#34864627)
The path integral suggests that all of the possible realities are like waves. When these waves are added up, they can interfere with each other in a way that only one of the possible realities can be seen. It's like when you throw two stones into a pond at the same time. The waves created by the stones will interfere with each other and create a single pattern on the surface of the water. In the same way, the path integral suggests that all of the possible realities can interfere with each other and create a single reality.
I don't believe "feeling" has anything to do with the MWI interpretation. At least I've never heard it described that way.

Given the equations that describe quantum mechanics (ie Schrodinger equation) MWI is essentially the "null hypothesis". No equations that describe collapse have ever passed the rigor of experiment and all collapse theories require modifications to the mathematics of QM. The burden of proof here is on theorists that support collapse theories not proponents of MWI.

> it doesn't seem to offer much in terms of explanation of how the entangled state ends up being what it is:

According to MWI, all possible results of an experiment are manifest and real. You're asking "which particular entangled state we end up in?". You end up in all of them. For a 2-state superposition system, there are 2 versions of "you" that exist after the experiment, both of which are equally real. Subsequent measurements of the quantum system will appear to be "collapsed" for both versions of you but each will see a different different and opposing values.

I came here to see if anyone mentioned Kickfolio :) They ended up changing their name to App.io at one point. Smart, great group of folks. Closed down back in like 2015.
Re:Ask HN: What is your spiritual practice? on Monday December 27, 2021 @11:50AM (#29704061)
I don't consider myself religious. Like many folks here (I assume) I've had a strong physicalist lean for much of my life. I've found great joy in the study of math, physics and of course computers.

The pull towards a more spiritual understanding of my condition has been heavily motivated by the mystery of my own consciousness. By consciousness I refer only to pure awareness. This moment in time with this collection of protons and electrons and complex field fluctuations is being experienced. And I find that so incredibly truly strange an inexplicable by any physical description. To carry out this dance of wave function evolution it does not seem that experience would be required at all. Yet it's there. Furthermore, when I'm quiet and my mind settles I can become acutely in touch with this pureness of experience and it appears to transcend mental processing, thoughts, memories and all of the things that are typically used to describe "I".

My story for what the universe is, is something along the lines of a Maxwell Tegmark level 4 multiverse populated with all possible mathematical structures and infused with a panpsychism quality of fundamental experience. Yes, I suspect that even electrons are experienced and I know that's weird lol. In the end though I know this description is just a story that my ego mind needs to make sense of all this stuff and I try not to place too much stock in it.

Practices that I find helpful and meaningful:

-Meditation (I usually aim for about 30 minutes a day)

-Listening to and reading Alan Watts

-Listening to and reading Ram Dass

-Semi-regular psychedelic experience (psilocybin primarily)

-Listening to East Forest's music

Re:Entanglement between superconducting qubits and a tardigrade on Thursday December 16, 2021 @08:24PM (#29586542)
OMG, +2 for this bootcamp. I think the above comment about shroomwater in a camelback applies here.
Re:Unveiling our new Quantum AI campus on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @02:53PM (#27199316)
'Devs' was the first thing I thought of when I saw this announcement.
After 10 years in the Bay Area tech scene I'm sitting here at a co-working space in Poulsbo, WA. Home ownership is still a challenge given how crazy the market is for places that are not in a city but close enough to commute if you wanted to. However, many QoL enhancements including views of the mountains every day, close to the Olympics, generally lower taxes/cost of living. I left the Bay in June and don't see going back any time soon.
I don't think that's accurate at all. These algorithms are only as accurate as the data being input into them. The current system of policing is deeply flawed and as a result the "data collected from crime statistics" will be skewed by these inherent, systemic biases. Mathematical optimization against a flawed dataset of this kind is highly likely to create a feedback loop of increasing bias with terrible human consequences.
Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring right now? on Monday March 23, 2020 @07:23PM (#22669978)
Sounds interesting. Successful background as founding CTO of multiple companies. Just the kind of space I'm interested in as well :)

[email protected]

Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2020) on Monday February 03, 2020 @04:33PM (#22229403)
test.ai | San Francisco, Seattle or Remote (US only) | Full-Time, Remote-OK | https://test.ai

We use AI to automatically test software and are working with some of the largest, most recognizable brands in the world to automate and accelerate Delivery and QA.

Our stack: Python, React, MySQL, GCP, Tensorflow

Backend Engineer: https://jobs.lever.co/test.ai/96f44a20-1fa5-45f9-b88a-5542e9...

ML Engineer: https://jobs.lever.co/test.ai/e5e716d8-693e-4efa-afc7-f6996e...

Great team, amazing benefits (including 401K matching), and genuinely interesting/difficult problems.

Re:Santa Cruz decriminalizes psychedelic mushrooms on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @07:07PM (#22187505)
I will add to other comments negating the value of doctors as gatekeepers by simply referring to the state of mental health care in our country. As someone who is fortunate to have only had to deal with it for a short amount of time I was still absolutely shocked. Until you've had experience with it personally (or via someone you care about) I think it's difficult to understand how abhorrent and sad it really is.

Additionally, I will add that for a drug like psilocybin the financial incentives are unlikely to ever line up. Large pharmaceutical companies will have no interest b/c it would cannibalize existing product lines. Psilocybin would never be a cash cow b/c it's so incredibly easy and inexpensive to produce. Microdoses can literally be manufactured by amateurs for fractions of a penny per dose and a bit of internet searching.

Mental health care is in an awful state and people are suffering terribly from illnesses that this drug can help with. It's cheap and easy to produce. Trusting it to the current system of us pharma and healthcare is too dangerous in my opinion.

Re:Santa Cruz decriminalizes psychedelic mushrooms on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @05:42PM (#22186775)
I can say it's definitely not a scam. I have personally been to multiple meetings with organizers in Oakland and San Francisco and witnessed that it is both well organized and well staffed. To my knowledge there are over 700 volunteers across the state in every county working on this initiative. Obviously, that doesn't mean it's going to be successful. I hope you're willing to risk $5 and purchase a button or sticker so you can send in your signed petition form :)
Re:Santa Cruz decriminalizes psychedelic mushrooms on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @05:37PM (#22186740)
Decrim SF here! Thanks for your support :)
Re:Santa Cruz decriminalizes psychedelic mushrooms on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @05:25PM (#22186617)
I respect that perspective as I believe it's an experience many have had with drugs. My anecdotal experience with psychedelics (psilocybin specifically) is that it is a qualitatively different substance. Non-toxic, non-addictive (experience actually discourages frequent usage), and genuinely healing. It has helped me personally and many I have spoken to with depression and a range of other mental illnesses. The key to efficacy with these substances is education and responsible use, neither of which will happen in the current environment of criminalization.
Re:Santa Cruz decriminalizes psychedelic mushrooms on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @05:19PM (#22186545)
Super excited to see this. If you live in California please head on over to http://www.decrimca.org/ We're working to get state wide decriminalization on the ballot in November and we need signatures! If you buy a button ($5) they'll send you a petition sheet. There are also signature locations and volunteers in every county in the state.
Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (October 2019) on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @03:52PM (#21129810)
Test.ai | https://www.test.ai/ | San Francisco, CA | All the roles... Here at test.ai we’ve built the world’s first AI-powered test automation platform to help companies deliver quality web and mobile user experiences to their customers. Our platform scales and tests thousands of apps in parallel without the need to code or maintain tests.

We're doing real AI over here. Not the kind you see in investor pitch decks.

What we're hiring for:

- Front End Developers: https://jobs.lever.co/test.ai/6eece66b-ee28-465c-ab59-292c4d...

- Back End Developers (Node or Python): https://jobs.lever.co/test.ai/6eece66b-ee28-465c-ab59-292c4d...

- Machine Learning Engineers: https://jobs.lever.co/test.ai/e5e716d8-693e-4efa-afc7-f6996e...

Older »