kodabbb

> The paper's comment on this is: "The selection of anchors is based on the general popularity of the codecs and the availability of the software implementations. We only intended to use codecs which are standardized internationally."

how very convenient, looks like politics outweigh any benchmarking

I have no game in the matter, but as a large website provider perspective, handling millions of images and processing thousands per day, I am glad not to have to deal with yet another format that would double our cache costs and force eternal support on the web. Not everybody has infinite google money to afford any kind of image format existing on the planet, and google can get only so much leeway after poisoning the web with webp.

j2c

this is so toxic it's not even funny

small typo in the article https://research.google/pubs/benchmarking-jpeg-xl-lossylossl... (very interesting read!)

will those require a bitstream change too?

Looks like there are more savings coming on lossless AVIF: https://www.reddit.com/r/AV1/comments/1b3lh08/comment/kstmbr...

Looks like there are more savings coming on lossless AVIF: https://www.reddit.com/r/AV1/comments/1b3lh08/comment/kstmbr...