kirab

> I think if an employee can't handle simple constructive criticism or clarifications maybe they should not be employed.

and then

> I was encouraged to use "y'all" [..] I thought that was a bridge too far.

I wonder if there might be a small bias on your part. The criticism you deem constructive everyone shall endure, but the other criticism you deem a bridge too far you yourself shall not endure.

Aside from the whole amazon problem:

I really love how the (flow-)chart in this article has two starting points and both flow perfectly into the vicious circle loops without any awkward gap no matter from which direction you start reading the chart.

Why do you claim that this change was made "so quickly"?

Nowhere does it say how long they were working on the new engine.

You are confusing attack target and attack vector I think.

A vector here is the attack angle/direction. Of course I can shift my direction and then target another car.

> Cobranded YubiKeys

More interesting than that even, a tier of YubiKeys that does not exist outside of this cooperation.

The supported features sit between a YubiKey 5C and a Security Key C and I did not find any other way to purchase this tier.

> Taiwan policy is that China and Taiwan are the same country

This is as useful as saying both South Korea and North Korea have the policy that South Korea and North Korea are the same country. Which was actually true until a few years ago.

I only understood it after reading some of co_king_5’s other comments. This is Poe’s law in action. I know several people who converted into AI coding cultists and they say the same things but seriously. Curiously none of them were coders before AI.

According to dev tools this is a simple `hyphens: auto` CSS

It even scales up to a whole town: https://polarnightenergy.com/news/worlds-largest-sand-batter...

I believe so, a human programmer would feel ashamed for adding comments like these:

  # Stop honeypots
  stop_honeypots
  
  # Stop eBPF monitoring
  stop_ebpf_monitoring
  
  # Stop API server
  stop_api_server

Source: https://github.com/IHATEGIVINGAUSERNAME/theProtector/blob/b1...

Microsoft started a huge Xbox "OS" push, against Steam Deck and Linux on Handhelds, and coincidentally they removed GamingOnLinux from Bing News.

Hmm..

FYI: Codeforces competitive programming scores (basically only) by time needed until valid solutions are posted

https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/133094

That means.. this benchmark is just saying o3 can write code faster than must humans (in a very time-limited contest, like 2 hours for 6 tasks). Beauty, readability or creativity is not rated. It’s essentially a "how fast can you make the unit tests pass" kind of competition.

Extra Sources:

https://wccftech.com/openai-rushing-to-become-for-profit-cor...

https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/o...

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/startups-tech/startups/open...

https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2024/09/26/openai-...

https://www.msn.com/en-ae/money/companies/it-looks-like-sam-...

also:

CTO leaving: https://x.com/miramurati/status/1839025700009030027

CRO (Chief Research Officer) leaving: https://x.com/bobmcgrewai/status/1839099787423134051

VP Research leaving: https://x.com/barret_zoph/status/1839095143397515452

You’re right, the billing is hourly (until you reach the monthly cap) but you also have this cancellation period. That’s weird?

Hetzner customer here. It’s a little hard to understand in the UX, but the price shown is the monthly max price.

It is actually paid by the hour.

The price per hour for this server is € 1.5980

more info: https://docs.hetzner.com/general/others/new-billing-model/

Hetzner customer here. It’s a little hard to understand in the UX, but the price shown is the monthly max price.

It is actually paid by the hour.

The price per hour for this server is € 1.5980

more info: https://docs.hetzner.com/general/others/new-billing-model/

"an ability previously thought to be unique to humans".

This sentence.

I’ve read and heard it so many times now, that according to Bayesian statistics, I should correct my assumptions and assume that, in the end, we will find out that there is not a single thing that’s unique to humans.

Agreed, took me 30 seconds to understand the point.

They do, AFAIK creators get much more money from Premium viewers than ad-supported viewers. And not just relatively, sometimes in absolute numbers as well.

The English explanations you find first for emergent are not really fitting here. Interestingly the Germany explanation for the same word seems to be much better.

I'm pretty sure they mean emergent as in emergent gameplay.

Here's a good explanation for that:

> Emergent gameplay refers to complex situations in video games, board games, or table top role-playing games that emerge from the interaction of relatively simple game mechanics.

So emergent is not inherently surprising. Games like Dwarf Fortress or Rimworld have a lot of emergent complexity but most of it was not surprising.

So in the context of LLM it means that complex reasoning is emergent based on simple underlying mechanics.

And since we thought humans’ complex reasoning skills were very unique.. We are surprised by the emergence of it in LLMs.

PS: The explanation for "emergence" is much better:

> In philosophy, systems theory, science, and art, emergence occurs when a complex entity has properties or behaviors that its parts do not have on their own, and emerge only when they interact in a wider whole.

No offense but I think you got the meaning of the record wrong:

https://community.cloudflare.com/t/keep-null-mx-in-addition-...

> Null MX does nothing to prevent spoofing. It is just to signal to mail senders that your domain does not receive email.

And I also found multiple other sources that specify that the null record only announces that the domain does not receive email. After some googling I didn't find a single source that shares your explanation.

People can still malicously send emails in your name, even without an mx record.

Don't trust my word for this, have a look at CloudFlares article about this:

"How to protect domains that do not send email"

https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/dns/dns-records/protect-...

Of course it's a security issue, because having neither SPF nor DKIM means that malicious actors can all too easily impersonate your email addresses and phish users with an email that apparently came from your domain.

ChatGPT is not good when it needs to answer directly. If you let it lead itself to the right answer it's pretty good.

# Kira

I found this sequence: "0, done, 2, free, 4, hive"

Reason step-by-step about the pattern.

Consecutively continue the sequence with four more entries.

Consecutively reflect on your answer and fix mistakes in case you broke the pattern.

# ChatGPT4

After examining the given sequence, "0, done, 2, free, 4, hive", we can notice an interesting pattern. It appears that the sequence alternates between numbers and words that sound like numbers. Let's break down the pattern:

"0" is a number. "done" sounds like the number "1" when spoken aloud. "2" is a number. "free" sounds like the number "3" when spoken aloud. "4" is a number. "hive" sounds like the number "5" when spoken aloud. Given this pattern, we can continue the sequence with four more entries:

The next number in the sequence is "6". The word that sounds like the number "7" is "heaven". The next number in the sequence is "8". The word that sounds like the number "9" is "nein", which is German for "no".

So, the continued sequence would be: "0, done, 2, free, 4, hive, 6, heaven, 8, nein".

Reflecting on the pattern and the answer provided, the continuation seems to be consistent with the established pattern. We alternated between numbers and words that phonetically resemble numbers, resulting in the sequence "6, heaven, 8, nein" for the next four entries.

They want a tight-knit group. Which is inherently exclusive but that's not the predominant attribute.

Did you read the article? It's literally what Intel is doing.