keen

Thanks for your kind words.

I agree in the simplicity of HTML and CSS if we're talking about simple websites. I've found that for more complex apps, and especially if you're using features of newer, half-specified standards (with style prefixes etc.) things can get a bit out of hand. One thing I want to point out is that you can separate your Dub code by style and function if you want to, although I can understand if you do not want that option.

Thanks for the feedback.

Would you mind explaining what you mean by "the lack of opinionated language design infers on code"? Are you referring to the fact that it's not specialised for either layout or presentation?

This is my side-project that I've been working on for a while. It would mean a great deal if you'd give me some feedback.

Edit: I'm wondering how it works in a technical sense.

So, please enlighten us: how is Bitcoin "mathematically flawed"?

My guess, however, is that the price will be more stable, given that the effect of any bad news won't be so amplified by the minting of new coins. Currently, the supply of coins is growing rapidly (just over 30% per annum). After the block reward halves, that rate will be below 13% per annum.

As others have mentioned, I'm also curious to see how the halve will affect the network's hashing rate (and therefore, security).

It will be interesting to see what happens at the end of this year when the block reward halves.

I was thinking that if the submitter knows who the creator is, they can include that person's email address (which is usually not too hard to find).

Could you somehow allow for sharing revenue with content creators (where possible)? That way, people might be more incentivized to vote, since it would also be a donation to the creator.

Maybe you allow the submitter to specify the artist's email address, to which coins are sent. It would be an honor system, for sure, but it seems better than nothing.

Edit: in case it's unclear, I know that bitcoins can't be sent to an email address directly, but a link to a wallet can.

There will be definitely be many freeloaders though, if the site's successful.

If you're not going to contribute anything, please don't comment.

What about the recent Comodo breaches? Their certs are still trusted by all major browsers (as far as I'm aware).

I realise they weren't complicit in issuing the fraudulent certs, but the effect is the same.

The Apples and Microsofts of the world might be okay with that.

Your first line to pg: You’re an ass. I would say that's an attack on his character.

You continue: My point is you're acting out of hate. Seems to me like an attack on his motives.

Then, you attack olozano instead of his points: For God's sakes if you're going to use a phrase at least know what it means.

Ad hominem translates to "to the person". You can split hairs over the correct modern usage of the phrase, but your posts are still littered with attacks on people, rather than their arguments.

No, you couldn't. Who would buy the works from you, when anyone can legally obtain them, free?

You might sell physical books containing the works, but then you're not selling (licenses to) the works themselves, just paper.

I imagine in a world without copyright, many people (though not most) would still 'pay' for works such as Harry Potter, through services like Amazon, iTunes, etc. Customers would demand that these services share revenue with authors, similar to the current model.

The point is, without copyright, no one would pay you for Harry Potter.

Precious metals are no longer used as money because of deflation? Care to justify that?

Are you sure it wasn't due to the numerous benefits of fiat money? (Not to say that fiat is perfect.)