kaonwarb

The commercial reality I’m sure they’re dealing with is that the percentage of users who care enough to deal with everything required for local inference is nowhere close to large enough to make it into an initial launch.

Cool tech. Typo note: "Ask your AI assitants anything you want."

This seems to be quite complicated! Was reading here https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Metabolism-of-caffeine-I... - > In humans, theobromine does not metabolize into caffeine, although the latter reaction occurs in young leaves of cacao plant.

This quote was when I know something was seriously wrong with the magazine I read assiduously as a child:

> Inequity between male and female athletes is a result not of inherent biological differences between the sexes but of biases in how they are treated in sports.

(https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-theory-that-m... - and I am not quoting out of context)

~20% in France, by one estimate (https://browsec.com/en/blog/vpn-usage-statistics)

Are you suggesting that governments should regulate platforms more, like they do physical spectrum?

Second this. FreeTaxUSA is great. Better interface, lower cost (truly free for federal, no catch). And coding harnesses are very good at handling taxes as well as a cross-check.

For the sake of RAM prices I wish you were correct, but I doubt it. Amazon is more likely just making some cash in a very rational way.

Source article is better, and refers to them as “violet-blue roses” https://www.suntory.com/sic/story/20260911/

I didn't see in the article where he recommended AI to structure an argument? He did suggest it can be helpful for structuring data.

There may well be a surfeit of articles, but at least in cancer research, we've had extraordinary progress recently. See, for example: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02745-5

Making one small corner of the world a little bit better is a good thing. There's not much use in complaining that it's not as big of an impact as could hypothetically be achieved on some larger issues.

How would you define a domestic company?

R.e. customers: Atlas accounts for a quarter of Delaware incorporations (https://x.com/jeff_weinstein/status/2023891497792532950?s=20). But yes, Clerky does have additional capabilities, as others point in.

iRobot is now 100% owned by Shenzhen Picea Robotics of China. (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1159167/000115916726...)

This wouldn't exist without OP's agency; it's reasonable for them to take credit.

If there are bugs, etc., that's fair game. Declaring hate for folks because of their approach is not.

Criticism with no justification behind it is cheap.

- Desired thing doesn't exist. - Author acts, using extremely helpful tools. - Desired thing now does exist.

Is that not enough?

Not quite, but sendcutsend.com is good.

Raise wages, and hence costs, relative to non-union locations (a direct purpose of unions!); implement restrictive work rules; lead occasional strikes.

What makes you think separate nations would effectively cooperate in this way?

Not in winter, for geographies that have serious winters.

Heavy conclusion from a single OSS release

This is very cool. Also, I had forgotten that the Vision Pro exists.

I believe you are projecting your personal misgivings onto the argument actually being made. May be better to write your own rebuttal instead?

I fear you may overestimate the median benefit of government oversight.

I resonate with every example given - setting jumpers by hand, sound card interrupts, autoexec.bat. I'm also a happy user of LLMs and agents. This article captured for me what is lost - which, as others point out, has long since been lost, if ever had, in other fields (e.g. modern cars vs. the Model T). I wouldn't go back, but I can still have a sense of loss.

Beautiful writing.