jtc331

We’ve known for a long time they goosed Q2, and we even know how.

Apparently you’ve missed all of Ed Zitron’s reporting?

Couldn’t even be bothered to disguise LLM generated content.

Painful to read.

Given there are cases of sudden onset autism being resolved with antifungals, it’s at least not implausible that fecal transplants could be effective too.

There’s some research on sudden onset autism being treated with antifungals; so at least sometimes a sudden change may be the result of something very specific in the gut.

“More social pressure to stop at the top of the hour.”

False.

This doesn’t work.

Source: a company doing this. Meetings just continue on to the 5 after mark.

Brown sugar should be packed; flour must not be — you’ll get substantially more mass per volume than the recipes assume.

I appreciate that the article correctly points out the core design flaw here of LLMs is the non-distinction between content and commands in prompts.

It’s unclear to me if it’s possible to significantly rethink the models to split those, but it seems that that is a minimal requirement to address the issue holistically.

VLAN with an id of 0 isn't possible on the new interface last I checked. Which, granted is a weird thing to do, but...

The obsession has at least one interesting question attached: ownership of real property. At the limit, at least, that becomes a genuinely interesting question.

That assumes that China’s population doesn’t collapse, which mathematically seems quite likely (and it’s already declining).

> What problem, other than judicial review, does it solve for the executive branch?

It’s fairly obvious on its face the concern of the EO is not judicial review but about agencies that nominally are past of the branch the President heads determining interpretations of law contrary to what the head of the executive desires.

And, it does genuinely seem weird to have an executive branch where the head of that branch doesn’t actually control things.

The negative reaction is entirely because of the current executive head, but no one would bat an eye if this were Barack Obama reigning in some executive agency interpreting, say, immigration law in opposition to DACA.

For example you might do surgery on people who wouldn’t benefit.

The problem is that the two theories can have competing indications as to how to prepare. Specifically: should we do gain of function research, or is that foolish — depends on how you read what happened in 2020.

I believe sucrose and fructose are processed differently — specifically fructose is processed by the liver so can have the same issues as alcohol there.

At minimum it changes the urgency for individuals with existing cookware.

Civil suits _do_ have jury trials. They’re even conducted with a lower standard of burden of proof, which is good or bad depending on if you’re potentially getting ramrodded or potentially finally past the Big CO’s lawyers.

See my comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41865429

Have you looked into Mutaflor probiotics? It’s a beneficial E. Coli (seriously) that has research showing it can colonize the gut and clinically improve e.g. IBS symptoms. I’ve personally seen it solve (or significantly mitigate) issues for multiple people.

Graviton single thread performance is _not_ the same as the Intel or AMD offerings on AWS.

The issue is with inverter based EV drive systems.

What about Vioxx?

How do you eliminate the personal incentive to have found a meaningful result? I don’t think that can be changed without redesigning the human psyche.

My wife seems to be basically immune to cavities; I get them easily. I brush very carefully; she brushes only quickly. Our diets are the same — if anything she probably gets more sugar. We have the same water source. Etc.

Clearly there’s a lot more to this than what you’re claiming.

Unless you’d propose that all of my current problems are due to conditions while I was child or similar.

What is in dispute isn’t that it crashed but how it crashed.

Yes, cheaper in the same store, but not usually compared to other stores that don’t have cash discounts.

Are the reporting methodologies constant for the years compared?

That just means advertisers need to manipulate children into pressuring parents. Not a good social dynamic.

But does it replicate _better_ than really running the experiment again?

Joking…but not joking.