News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

jpadvo

Re:Dragons, Memory and Navigating the Globe Using Only Your Wits on Saturday November 01, 2014 @10:20PM (#8545360)
One of the references seems to have a little more detail, and also some leads for more learning:

http://www.pbs.org/wayfinders/wayfinding2.html

Re:I Sold My Startup for $25.5 Million on Friday June 06, 2014 @01:13PM (#7859128)
So, what should a early startup be doing with "ip assignment"? We hire people from places like elance and odesk - and a few irl people - is there something we should have been having them sign?
Re:GitHub's Explore Email on Monday November 11, 2013 @05:54PM (#6714688)
How do you find these devs who star interesting repos?

Edit: after some thought and poking around, one way to find these devs is to just look at the profiles of devs who run projects you use. If they've starred a lot of repos, see if they star things you would be interested in. If so, follow them. Easy.

Re:Show HN: zen.jquery on Monday September 16, 2013 @02:38PM (#6394960)
This is a jQuery plugin that makes it super simple to add random moments of zen from https://api.github.com/zen . We just added it to the navbar of our internal dashboard, and it's nice.
Re:Show HN: Ready-made, Modular Landing Pages for Startups on Thursday August 29, 2013 @07:46PM (#6299337)
Beautiful design, and with the pricing change it is a great buy. One quick note -- when you click the eye buttons to see details, the old prices still show up.
Re:We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us! on Saturday August 24, 2013 @07:08PM (#6270193)
Yes, it used to be that way.
Re:We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us! on Saturday August 24, 2013 @07:00PM (#6270176)
The reason I publicly posted this is because it is an issue about community standards, not just a personal issue between me and the company.

It's interesting to think about my own motivations -- I wonder if I would have been gentler if their post hadn't been anonymous. If so, should I have been gentler even though their post was anonymous? Anyway, I apologize if this caused unnecessary hurt, I didn't mean to.

Re:We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us! on Saturday August 24, 2013 @06:16PM (#6270003)
I figured they would learn by getting called out like this. And since the post was anonymous, it doesn't really hurt them anyway. Free learning experience.

We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

In response to a story currently on the front page titled "FB is the Only Other Platform Used by 20% of College Students. Join Us!" [1]Do you actually want to hire people who are going to fall for dishonest linkbait like that?YC companies, I understand that you get to post job ads on HN and they automatically show up on the front page. Great. But please, show some respect to the people you are...

( Read More... | 68 comments | 350 points | on HN )
Re:Your top 100 unix commands, for science on Sunday May 19, 2013 @01:20PM (#5733565)
This would be fantastic if all it had was the instructions to see your own top commands. What a great way to discover opportunities for automation and time saving!

I can't wait for the full results.

Re:Being Bold on Thursday April 11, 2013 @06:01PM (#5535053)
Done, thanks Bubs. Can't wait to get ahold of this. :)
Re:Being Bold on Thursday April 11, 2013 @12:24PM (#5532933)
Marketplace as a Service? If that's what this is, and it sounds like it, that would be fantastic. For the last year or two we've thought that a marketplace would be a great potential fit for our app, but simply don't have the resources to build and maintain the infrastructure ourselves.
Re:Who Has the Guts for Gluten? on Monday February 25, 2013 @12:03AM (#5277393)
A relative of mine thought she had a gluten intolerance - turned out it was something in enriched white flour. She can eat any kind of wheat product if it's made with home-ground flour.
Re:Poll: Do you find article title changes annoying? on Sunday February 03, 2013 @05:16PM (#5161436)
This is exactly the problem. A good title on Hacker News is itself a valuable piece of content. A good title here will concisely convey the point of an article, so that each of us can decide if we want to check it out.

Often this is directly at odds with the purpose of a "natural title", which is designed by the author to entice and tantalize in order to drag eyeballs to it. Not to communicate, but to manipulate.

If the natural title is also good as a HN title, great. But if not, and if the submitter made a good effort to construct a good HN title, then it should not be changed.

Re:Show HN: Flatsies – concept sharing for designers on Monday January 14, 2013 @06:51PM (#5057484)
This looks really slick. Probably worth thinking about building some kind of tour, or explanation of how it works. The screenshot is beautiful, but may be insufficient to get people to sign up just to learn more.
Re:Here’s what I learned hanging out with Jason Fried on Monday January 07, 2013 @01:42PM (#5022430)
The text right below the image says "Firefly is a great way to help our less technically savvy users navigate our product."

They are trying to evoke the kind of user who provides the hardest challenge to support, and who would benefit the most from screen sharing during support.

It might be more clear if they had the text overlaid or above the image, so that the instant you see that filthy beast of a machine you know what they're saying. Instead of the momentary confusion about "what the heck is this thing doing here?"

Who knows. With a/b testing, probably them. :)

Re:On Heroku and 2012 on Wednesday December 05, 2012 @08:35PM (#4879754)
Thank you -- I haven't read that story in a long time, and it is a great reminder.
Re:On Heroku and 2012 on Tuesday December 04, 2012 @10:11PM (#4874664)
> Life's not a race, but there's no speed limit either.

I love this. I've been learning recently that one of my chief sources of stress is feeling pinched for time. Mainly from feeling like I'm not getting as much done as I need to (I'm a cofounder of a bootstrapped startup). But what I've discovered is that if I relax, and enjoy the feeling of progress as it happens, I can be much more excited about work. And a much happier person.

And, somewhat ironically, extra motivation kicks in and I'm pretty sure I wind up getting more done.

That one line from Kenneth sums up the entire glorious contradiction in a way that makes sense.

> it does still say something important: that the patent system isn't totally breaking innovation.

Rarely is it the case that anything is truly "total". And if the patent system is squashing 25% of innovation in the software industry, or even 10%, that is a big problem.

Also, it is possible to squash certain kinds of innovators - like startups without tens or hundreds of millions of dollars to spend on patent litigation. While massive corporations can get nailed for a billion or two and hardly notice.

A patent-litigious environment is deadly for startups. And startups are crucial innovators.

...which is available here: https://github.com/robashton/HoverBattles

I just downloaded it and am gonna see if I can get it to run...

Edit: to run the game, download the code, and open the folder in your terminal, and run:

> npm install > npm install socket.io > mv config/keys.json.example config/keys.json > node server.js

Then open your browser and navigate to http://localhost:8000

I'm a web developer, but am just about to jump into making a multiplayer HTML5 game, just for fun.

But after reading this post, and the one linked at the bottom [1], I'm thinking maybe this is going to be pretty valuable professionally. It should give insight from a completely different vantage point on what it means to write good code. By the way, you really should read that other post, too. It offers some interesting ideas to think about.

[1] http://codeofrob.com/entries/a-relaxed-attitude-towards-the-...

Re:Show HN: ChargeBack.cc - Get your money back on Sunday November 18, 2012 @02:46AM (#4800174)
I will do that. Thanks!
Re:Show HN: ChargeBack.cc - Get your money back on Saturday November 17, 2012 @06:21PM (#4799290)
I came here ready to seriously hate on you, but now I love what you are doing. :)

Sometimes customers see their credit card bill, decide they don't want the service anymore, and instead of calling our number (printed on the credit card statement) or logging into their account to unsubscribe, they just call the credit card company and ask them to stop payment. It's really frustrating, because we gladly refund money if people aren't happy with our product.

Anyway, the issue is that sometimes the simplest thing for a user to do is call the number on their bill and ask for that charge to go away.

If you could partner with the credit card companies, and get your contact information or url listed on bills, that would be a HUGE win for you, and for startups like us. And if you could somehow save the credit card companies money, or even make them money, it could be a win for them to.

Whatever you decide to do, good luck. And post back again if there's anything startups can do to help you. :)

Re::syntax Off on Monday November 05, 2012 @02:11AM (#4742569)
Interesting. Both what Kyle talks about, and also the fact that I've never thought of not having syntax highlighting before. It's just been a built in assumption.

I opened vim and cycled through syntax on, syntax off a few times, and thought about what I think about when I see it. After this short experiment, I think that most of what I use syntax highlighting for is just to add texture to the code. The pattern of indentations and syntax highlighting gives the code shape.

So when I scroll, or scan the code, I've got another a set of visual anchors in addition to the structure given by indentation. It makes me feel more comfortable. Past that, for me, the syntax highlighting is just noise.

Makes me wonder how to increase the feeling of visual structure in the code without introducing visual noise...

Older »