joshgel
I think mammography is a great example. Many people are quite surprised to hear that the Positive Predictive Value of a screening mammography is only in 10-15% range. This despite mammography being a pretty sensitive test. This is because despite good test performance characteristics, applied across a large population of relatively health people, the 2-5% false positive rate is a large number of people.
> That must be worst website ever made.
the level of confidence (this is a second time founder after all) to put that on their website gives me confidence that they can make this work
For some context, the USMLE is taken during medical school. The amount I have learned about actually practicing medicine since graduating is probably an order of magnitude more than everything I learned in medical school! I still learn stuff, all the time, and I’m not just talking about new research.
So, while impressive and clearly part of the future world, we shouldn’t get too far ahead of ourselves with the current models.
Amazon Purchasing OneMedical for $3.9B
This is a bit of a misunderstanding. CPT codes are part of professional services billing, while DRGs are exclusively for inpatient acute care billing. If you are admitted to a hospital, you’ll probably have to deal with both.
There are lots of things that cause anemia! And someone with unexplained anemia deserves a complete work up (especially with hemoglobin levels in the 4-5 range), including for tick-borne illnesses, especially if they have been in an endemic area. But lots of other things worth checking too, many more dangerous than tick-borne illnesses.
Ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia and torsades are acutely deadly. You have seconds to minutes to get a normal rhythm back.
The charts colors made me feel like they were implying a-fib was the worst rhythm listed. (Though they list the severity in the descriptions in small text)
SmarterDx | Competitive salary + equity + benefits | NYC or Remote | Full-time | Experience: 3+ years
## Why SmarterDx
1. *We solve an important problem.* The cost of transactions for healthcare in the U.S. exceeds $350B a year. That’s not the cost of care; that’s not what is paid to doctors or nurses; that is just the friction of collecting payments from insurance companies (so not a cent of that provides value to patients)! SmarterDx improves this process and ensures payments are more accurate. 2. *We have real traction.* Our product directly ties to customer revenue. As a result, our founding team was able to grow the business to over $1M in contracted revenue without raising. But we believe we can 10X that in the next 1.5 years and have raised $5.7M from Floodgate, a top-tier SV fund, and Flare Capital, a top-tier Healthcare fund, to drive that growth. 3. *We are a close-knit team that cares about your growth.* All three founders are technical (two are physicians who code, and the third led quant engineering at a global investment bank). We select for mission-oriented teammates who are deeply thoughtful while being biased towards action; and who can disagree with others (a side effect of having novel viewpoints) while being genuinely nice and respectful. In return, we will do our best to help you grow your career and achieve a great personal outcome.
## About the role
We are looking to hire a *Senior or Principal Full Stack Engineer* to join our small but growing team. As an early employee, you’ll have an opportunity to work with awesome people (like an ex Apache board member!) and your work will influence all aspects of the product and business. You will also help shape our core engineering culture and grow the team.
As such, you'll have to be willing to get your hands dirty with (and learn) everything across the stack: healthcare data, APIs, frontend, backend, data engineering, algorithms, analytics, bug reporting, etc. (but the codebase is still small and we will do our best to give you time to dive deeply into specific areas).
## Our stack
- React & GraphQL - NextJS & Python - AWS
Interested? Please send your resume to hiring (at) smarterdx.com
It's honestly surprising that more haven't taken the jump and is really shocking that hospitals aren't doing more to retain critical staff.
Abhorrent but not about preventing marriages, at least not directly
Doctors aren’t reimbursed for prescribing medications directly (except chemotherapy infusions). Was the physician selling the medication directly? That’s not commonplace.
Clinicians may financially benefit from not refusing their patients requests and thus losing the patient to another doctor that will acquiesce. But that’s a tricky topic to untangle.
But, if a company directly contributes to decline in civil discourse and harms democracy, and thereby harms the users, then isn't it a government role to step in? And isn't this the governments role even if users can't see the harm at the micro-level of their daily interactions with the company? I guess that is the argument at least. Really its a balance between values: individual freedom and the collective good.
For data, you might look at RSV trends compared to usual. (Usual is winter spike).
Can’t read actual methods to check if this was adjusted for…
The biggest issue is the costs of false positives, which with any early intervention protocol are likely to be high and, questionably, on balance a net negative.
Ultimately doctors have to take the whole clinical picture into account instead of relying on a couple markers or vital signs.
You’re right that a big problem is the inability of our system to do testing at home, which might greatly expand the scope of the clinical picture. But it still wouldn’t be a cure-all