jerska
Chess moves are simply tokens as any other. Given enough chess training data, it would make sense to have part of the network trained to handle chess specifically instead of simply encoding basic lists of moves and follow-ups. The result would be a general purpose sub-network trained on chess.
While you’re correct that it does massively help, money is only a resource, which you can use to trade for a lot of things, but there are people, things and abstract concepts that money can’t buy.
I believe the author was talking about set -e (often used with -o pipefail), so that any unhandled error simply exits the script.
PhotoRoom begs to disagree with this statement.
The bad faith and passive-aggressive tone were unwarranted.
This article is so annoying.
It has some truth to it, e.g. the mismatch between incentives and success, or even the corporate bullshit to avoid saying hard truths are on point. But the second part lacks the proper reasoning needed to establish the self-proclaimed intelligence of it author. Comparing software development’s product building with fencing competitions is so far-fetched, yet most of the arguments of the second part build on this premise. You don’t need amazing individuals to build a great thing, what you need is a great team. That’s why most people try to address the system. It’s hard to do when you factor in individual incentives, but it’s not because everybody is dumb, it’s because everybody (smartly) addresses their own self-interests above the company’s.
Not saying that MS’s response was great, but I agree with GP that the whole thing is hyberbolic.
Two small notes after completing my read:
1. You're using `npm prune --omit=dev` after the build. It's probably fast enough, but I'm wondering if it wouldn't be worth it to install the dependencies in two steps: first `dependencies` in a first image, then in a second image, copy those and rerun `npm install` to also install the `devDependencies`. You could then copy in the final image:
- The production dependencies from the `deps` image
- The built code from the `build` image
2. Also, it's probably a detail, but you're copying the entire app folder in the final image, maybe you could save some extra bytes by only copying the built artifacts (e.g. `dist/` in most setups).Listen to your body. Always.
The level of understanding is indeed not there yet to rival directly with competitors, but you’re doing more than a decent job on a lot of requests which is no small feat looking at the competition.
Wishing you luck, and curious to see it evolve!
Yes taxes are higher in France. Yes some budgets and jobs might need a pay cut to apply a similar model in the US. That doesn’t sound like an impossible task.
All I’m saying is that dismissing the whole idea of your parent comment by saying that a basic income representing a high portion of GDP would imply absurdly high inflation rates is not true, as there are at least a few counter-examples. Maybe the amount is too high. But the idea is not as unreasonable as you made it sound.
Note regarding population decline: France is reaching its peak of aged population / younger blood to infuse the economy following WW2’s baby boom. It will likely not have a higher impact than it currently has today in the upcoming years.
Otherwise, you’d have looked at other comparable economic powers worldwide that provide a more socialist alternative and see that they are nowhere near the inflation rate you’re describing, e.g. France.
Granted, it’s not $30K a year, but $7.5K for a single person, with free healthcare & education that could be considered a form of income. Doing the same maths as you did, round it $10K per person and you’re at 30% of GDP.
It’s been running for years and debt levels didn’t skyrocket much higher than the US.
But a big reason the welders aren’t the focus of the blame is that they were the first ones to die in the explosion.
The consequences for PG&E were simply 4 millions here, which is a ridiculously small amount.
Also, you don’t treat individuals and companies the same way.
Your link:
> According to Electrek, Tesla trails behind other companies in terms of autonomous driving tech based on a list created by Navigant Research, an independent research firm.
Electrek’s article:
> Electrek’s Take
> I think Navigant’s autonomous leaderboard is ridiculous. There are way too many brands that keep most of their development under wraps, which makes it hard to evaluate them and therefore, it gives very little value to a leaderboard like this in my opinion.