News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

jerrinot

Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @10:07AM (#46616869)
clock_gettime() goes through the vDSO shim, but whether it avoids a syscall depends on the clock ID and (in some cases) the clock source. For thread-specific CPU user time, the vDSO shim cannot resolve the request in user space and must transit into the kernel. In this specific case, there is absolutely a syscall.
Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @07:42AM (#46615373)
You raise a fair point about the percentiles. Those are reported as point estimates without confidence intervals and the implied precision overstates what system clock can deliver.

The mean does get proper statistical treatment (t-distribution confidence interval), but you're right that JMH doesn't compute confidence intervals for percentiles. Reporting p0.00 with three significant figures is ... optimistic.

That said I think the core finding survives this critique. The improvement shows up consistently across ~11 million samples at every percentile from p0.50 through p0.999.

Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @04:12AM (#46613952)
Hi Jonas, thanks for the work on OpenJDK and the post! I swear I hadn't seen your blog :) I finished my draft around Christmas and it’s been in the queue since. Great minds think alike, I guess.

edit: I just read your blog in full and I have to say I like it more than mine. You put a lot more rigor into it. I’m just peeking into things.

Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @04:01AM (#46613882)
In a system with green threads, you typically want the CPU time of the fiber or tasklet rather than the carrier thread. In that case, you have to ask the scheduler, not the kernel.
Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @08:47PM (#46611289)
Courtesy of Brendan Gregg and his flamegraph.pl scripts: https://github.com/brendangregg/FlameGraph

Normally, I use the generator included in async-profiler. It produces interactive HTML. But for this post, I used Brendan’s tool specifically to have a single, interactive SVG.

Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @08:35PM (#46611228)
no problem at all, I was confused too when I saw the profile for the first time.
Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @08:02PM (#46610981)
That's a brilliant trick. The setup overhead and permission requirements for perf_event might be heavy for arbitrary threads, but for long-lived threads it looks pretty awesome! Thanks for sharing!
Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @07:49PM (#46610854)
Exactly this.
Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @07:47PM (#46610840)
Only for some clocks (CLOCK_MONOTONIC, etc) and some clock sources. For VIRT/SCHED, the vDSO shim still has to invoke the actual syscall. You can't avoid the kernel transition when you need per-thread accounting.
Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @07:26PM (#46610654)
I was unsure whether to post it or not so I am glad you found it useful!
Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @06:53PM (#46610284)
Fair point. These were run on a standard dev workstation under load, which may account for the noise. I haven't done a deep dive into the outliers yet, but the distribution definitely warrants a more isolated look.
Re:A 40-line fix eliminated a 400x performance gap on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @06:13PM (#46609804)
Author here. After my last post about kernel bugs, I spent some time looking at how the JVM reports its own thread activity. It turns out that "What is the CPU time of this thread?" is/was a much more expensive question than it should be.
I have no practical experience with bpftrace, so it did not occur to me. I'll give it a try and perhaps there's gonna be a 2nd part of this investigation.
It's much tougher when it's so hard to reproduce. Perhaps the NMI watchdog could help? https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/lockup-watchdogs.html
Wow, someone is actually reading the article in detail, that's a good feeling! In C, the != operator has higher precedence than the || operator. That said, extra parentheses never hurt readability.
Thanks for the kind words!

Heatmaps are amazing for pattern spotting. I also use them when hunting irregular hiccups or outliers. More people should know about this feature.

Author here. I've always been kernel-curious despite never having worked on one myself. Consider this either a collection of impractical party tricks or a hands-on way to get a feel for kernel internals.
Re:IBM to Acquire Confluent on Monday December 08, 2025 @10:10AM (#46193100)
Snowflake did not acquire RP after all.
Re:From Rust to reality: The hidden journey of fetch_max on Wednesday September 24, 2025 @04:00AM (#45357557)
I expect candidates to suggest similar optimisations, but I felt it was unnecessary for the article itself.
Re:From Rust to reality: The hidden journey of fetch_max on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @07:53PM (#45354402)
That’s a neat trick, albeit with limited applicability given the very narrow range. Thanks for sharing!
Re:From Rust to reality: The hidden journey of fetch_max on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @06:44PM (#45353766)
That's a very good question. A proper compiler engineer would know, but I will do my best to find something and report back.

Edit: I could not find any pass with a pattern matching to replace CAS loops. The closest thing I could find is this pass: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/06fb26c3a4ede66755... I reckon one could write a similar pass to recognize CAS idioms, but its usefulness would be probably rather limited and not worth the effort/risks.

Re:From Rust to reality: The hidden journey of fetch_max on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @06:08PM (#45353397)
Hi, author here. My superpower is spending unreasonable amounts of time researching things with no practical purpose. Occasionally I blog about it - as a warning to others.

Older »