jcarney
http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/01/31/is-google-intentional...
They recently got rapped by the FTC for it.
http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/ftc-googles-ad-practice-i...
The difference is that the negative Microsoft news tends to float on top of sites like HN more than positive news, and the reverse is true for Google so this alters perceptions of people.
Apple could have probably made more money over the years by selling Macs with Windows and retiring their own OS.
Competition is good, for example see the flat look and concentration on typography that both Android and iOS borrowed from Windows Phone.
That's why I don't get all the deriding of Firefox OS and Ubuntu Phone. Android has plenty hardware OEMs behind it.
The tech does make normal pictures look better because of the oversampling. Not to mention optical image stabilization for reducing blur and shake in both image and video.
http://c699379.r79.cf3.rackcdn.com/Nokia%20808%20Pureview%20...
Perhaps read the whitepaper before knocking it down as meaningless?
http://i.nokia.com/blob/view/-/849564/data/2/-/Download1.pdf
If you're comparing a phone camera with a DSLR, that's already saying something.
Here's a review of the technology by a digital photography site.
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8083837371/review-nokia-808...