jbaptiste

That’s fair, I should have framed it more clearly upfront. Thanks for the feedback.

I was excited about the results. The intent was to talk about performance and architecture, not to imply this was a quick or effortless project. There’s been a lot of iteration and experimentation behind it, and I should have communicated that context better as well as the use of AI for the help.

Fair point. And as what it is, not a nats replacement, certainly dont have the time to maintain that this way, a test/tech demo/fun side project that yielded super interesting results is probably the answer. As usual I'm probably way too enthusiast when I see some nice results like that and the goal here was to talk about that, but it shifted super fast. So yes Claude rewrote lots of parts, and that's what I love about it. Testing an idea happens in way less time than before, and I find that super cool.

Its an extract of two weeks of work. And yes Claude did the website and rewrote my code that was absolutely without comments and a gigantic mess. It's an extract of the fourth attempt actually. Src4/ was the original folder. But my goal my to test the architecture applied to nats not to say I've done it without ai?

Claude did rewrote lots of my original messy code. No shame in that? But in the end the interest was in the underlying architecture, applied to nats protocol. Anyway.

Absolutely not and will never have.

My personal rig and Zig because I worked with it for a little more than a year. It was a fun test to do.

Oh god no. Just having fun with zig and being a little over enthusiast I guess. I'm a big fan of nats, and really wanted to see how far you can push the idea if you do it differently. I was not expecting that tbh but, hpn too!

Coming from i3 this was one of my biggest pain on osx, running skhd + yabai to solve that. Still not i3's perfect experience: I did not manage to have only one action key, but starting to get closer. And you can have that full screen without the osx full screen!

Even with multi providers, DNS issues are a cluster fuck.

We had the very same issue with kube-dns not that long ago, have you considered running prometheus against your cluster ?

You can leverage the power of the kubernetes services to make viable monitoring along automatic discovery for new metrics/services.

We're using it for some time on three different clusters (kubernetes, aws and bare metal) and are very pleased with the performances.

Maybe there is something special for the member of GCE startup program, but for us the quotas requests take between 1min and 1 hour, where the same requests over aws took a few days, and endless discussions.

Our all experience with the folks over at Google has been amazing compared to the poor level we had with AWS.

Granted we are on a range way lower than yours.

That's very true. In Europe, Sweden is in our minds like one of the two or three countries where everything seems to be "good". Economics are good, people are nice, unemployment seems low and somehow those countries act as "The goods and respectables guys from the north". That's a very common feeling in EU.

Concerning Weave that's quite a good news, the weave point of view for docker networking is good and can be easily setup in many (not all of them of course) infrastructure.

Awesome, i'm quite happy to see how far they're going ! Docker is a great tool and used here with greatness !