jamespropp
Re:On Beyond Omega
on Sunday October 18, 2026 @08:00PM (#50146782)
I am curious whether there are other applications of Cantor's ordinals that I am unaware of.
Re:Solving the Flat Cube
on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @07:02PM (#49368288)
I'd be curious to know whether anyone can find "God's number" for this puzzle.
Solving the Flat Cube
Re:What Bad Bases Are Good For
on Tuesday July 21, 2026 @07:23AM (#48990799)
I agree (see endnote #5).
What Bad Bases Are Good For
Re:Seventeen Camels and Where They Can Take You
on Wednesday June 17, 2026 @05:21PM (#48577103)
Thanks for catching this! I fixed the error.
Re:Seventeen Camels and Where They Can Take You
on Wednesday June 17, 2026 @05:20PM (#48577089)
I added a sentence: “(Warning: This is sort of a trick question, so don’t expect a textbook-style answer!)” I hope that this will prevent others from being similarly frustrated.
Re:\Begin{Proof} Declaration
on Wednesday June 03, 2026 @01:52PM (#48387289)
I plan to continue using AI tools, but to do so in a mindful way, to avoid becoming addicted to them, and to be prepared to back off if I don’t like the direction they take me in.
\Begin{Proof} Declaration
What early exponential growth can't tell us about runaway processes
This is an essay about a simple but (I think) underappreciated point:If a process follows a logistic curve, then early behavior is almost indistinguishable from exponential growth, which means you generally can’t infer its eventual carrying capacity from early data.In other words, very different long-term outcomes can all be consistent with the same initial “runaway” phase, even with very good...
Re:In Praise of Stupid Questions
on Sunday March 15, 2026 @12:24PM (#47388922)
Perhaps an additional Moral is, if a calculation can be done in an afternoon, it's probably been done before. (I say this because it's been pointed out in the Comments section of my essay that Jon Lu asked and answered the same question back in 2016.)
Re:In Praise of Stupid Questions
on Sunday March 15, 2026 @12:18PM (#47388863)
I'm not sure I understand your question. Given that it takes an infinite amount of time to write down the decimal expansion of pi, what might it mean to compute pi in finite time?
Re:In Praise of Stupid Questions
on Sunday March 15, 2026 @12:09PM (#47388773)
Thanks for catching this! What was in my mind when I wrote the first of those two sentences was the entirety of my past experience using ChatGPT as a research tool, and all the times it made mistakes. (For a funny example, see my January 17, 2023 essay “Denominators and Doppelgängers” in which I describe ChatGPT's proof that .999... is less than 1.) But you're 100% right that the version of my essay that I posted last week didn't make this clear; I'll update it appropriately. I'll also add a brief description of ChatGPT's bibliographic blunder.
Re:In Praise of Stupid Questions
on Thursday March 12, 2026 @04:43PM (#47356803)
As usual, I'm most interested in comments that will help me improve the article, but feedback of every kind is welcome!
In Praise of Stupid Questions
Re:Is Matrix Multiplication Ugly?
on Saturday November 22, 2025 @03:27PM (#46017964)
I’ve updated this passage. Let me know if the new version is clearer.
Re:Is Matrix Multiplication Ugly?
on Friday November 21, 2025 @07:24PM (#46010763)
Thanks for pointing this out. I’ll work on this passage tomorrow.
Re:Is Matrix Multiplication Ugly?
on Friday November 21, 2025 @07:21PM (#46010745)
Yes!
Re:Is Matrix Multiplication Ugly?
on Friday November 21, 2025 @05:21PM (#46009709)
Do you disagree with my take or think I’m missing Witt’s point? I’d be happy to hear from people who disagree with me.
Is Matrix Multiplication Ugly?
Picturing Mathematics
Randomness Made to Order, part 1
When .999 Isn't 1
Math and the Museum
Is 1 Prime, and Does It Matter?
How Pi Almost Wasn't
Re:Dedekind's Subtle Knife
on Monday February 17, 2025 @06:18PM (#43084201)
Richard Dedekind didn't just invent Dedekind cuts (and rings and ideals); he gave us a new way to think about (or avoid thinking about) the ultimate nature of mathematical reality.
Dedekind's Subtle Knife
Re:
on Friday January 17, 2025 @07:41AM (#42736930)
What makes the real number system different from all the smaller number systems it contains? Richard Dedekind found a simple answer: a geometric axiom that Euclid missed.