james0001

That's excellent work, a good tribute. Thank you.

They have a greater tendency to do so, yes.

Probably stems from the implicit assumption that since academia leans left, that these progressives will have the needed scientific support for their policy proposals.

Oof, I must've offended a couple academics

It doesn't need to be covered just don't try to restrict me from diagnosing my own health when doctors have shown their shit at diagnostics

You know you're talking to a person with "close adherence to progressive extremist ideology" when they assume the facts are on their side and the other side is just lies. Real scientific integrity eh?

Why not? The science is far from settled. In much the same way that the media leans left, so does academia. Academia is not immune from corruption, and dare I say, academia is a worse swamp than Washington.

Can you get a private MRI without a doctor's requisition in Australia? I know in Canada they try to burn you at the stake if you do that.

Please stop spamming your link

Hey smokey, you seem to have a good grasp of practical blockchain applications. Was wondering if you think it is feasible to use Blockchain for organic agricultural commodities? The idea being that the transparency blockchain can bring could help more accurately price organic ag commodities, which still are undervalued at that level (no transparency in this market, still getting lumped in with regular ag commodities). Just curious, like a organic commodities exchange using blockchain for significantly faster settlement and ability to audit the identity of a commodity (quantity, quality, location/logistics). Wondering if you think blockchain could have a use in something like that?

Project much? Looks like you're the one getting all heated and angry at someone defending the social sciences and are trying to attack them. It's better not to bring emotion into discussions of science.