News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

infinitesimal

It's funny because the students at the competitive schools work their ass off for the entire semester/ quarter to learn this material. If you use the weakest possible definition for "learn," then you can claim you have learned anything you want. But that doesn't mean your skill will be comparable to someone who spent 3-5 months practicing non-stop.
Number of downloads? Price? Ads? No ads? iOS? Android?
Why do you say (3)?

How much money can be made from a somewhat successful mobile app?

I'm considering either iOS or android, and either making it nonfree or free (but with ads). Suppose it got around 100,000 downloads and the pay version is priced at a dollar. How much can a developer make in all of the 4 scenarios?I'm completely unfamiliar with the policies in either market (for example, how big of a chunk apple takes or how ads work). What are other things I need to consider?

( Read More... | 6 comments | 8 points | on HN )
Re:Anic - Faster than C, Safer than Java, Simpler than *sh on Wednesday August 15, 2012 @03:08AM (#4384966)
Functional programming is a leaky abstraction?
Re:Why philosophy is largely ignored by science on Tuesday June 19, 2012 @07:33PM (#4134800)
The question in philosophy is "how does consciousness arise from the physical?" While you can claim it's due to some complex interaction in our brains, and while we have significant evidence that this is the case, I don't think that answers the question. Philosophers want to know the mechanism which produces the experience. Arguing that consciousness (or experience) is physical is a tough thing to do from first principles because of our own intuitive sense of it.

For example, how is it that the electrical signals in our brains produce "us" while electrical signals in other things don't produce conscious things? How are they different? What would it take to make a circuit "conscious"?

I can't give you good definitions for consciousness or experience and I can't even say that the question(s) make(s) sense. I'm just trying to give you give you a picture of what some people think.

I've lost a significant amount of weight twice (> 80lbs) and, externally, I seem to have also changed my behavior in a substantial way. I am a much better student than I was before in part because of my own motivation and determination. As determined as I am though, I still run into academic problems. Is it because of my own work ethic? I don't think so.

I don't perceive losing weight to be a herculean feat, but that's because I have shown myself that it's something I can overcome. Changing how my mind works? Is that a herculean feat? I don't know, but I seem to have difficulties with it which I cannot immediately work around with a "little repetition."

Please give me a time in your life when you've been able to make a significant intellectual change from just "a little repetition" and "making sure that you're not repeating bad habits."

Re:Is Now the Time to Hire MBAs? on Saturday May 19, 2012 @12:25AM (#3995094)
Why aren't we teaching our scientists and engineers in a similar fashion then?
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep? on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @02:11AM (#3975166)
I'm not making generalizations about the college experience. His claim seemed all encompassing to me.
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep? on Monday May 14, 2012 @11:01PM (#3974647)
"Getting an A is as easy as doing everything, it doesn't require any real intelligence or understanding. This is really what college is all about."

You don't have a representative experience. Try going to a top 5 school in science/ engineering/ math.