indigoviolet
indigoviolet on Hacker News
This is great. Would love to see an import from twitter/reddit subs feature in the extension.
user_id:389472984 isn't anonymized. Aggregated and anonymized data means, "gender:male ages:18-34"
Posted by
indigoviolet on Tuesday September 27, 2011 @04:38PM
from the facebook.com dept.
Posted by
indigoviolet on Monday September 26, 2011 @04:07PM
from the b.akumar.me dept.
This is an excellent point, let me pass that on to the platform permissions people.
Interesting. I'll file a bug. Thanks for the info.
I'm curious, what browser/OS are you using? Your screenshots look different from my view of the site, specifically, the text is either displaced or enlarged in your screenshots, making it look weird.
The spirit of that slogan is more like "Move fast and don't be afraid to disrupt established patterns". The intention is to give employees licence to think out of the box and try out lots of new ideas, without being bogged down by what has gone before. Everyone I've talked to (I personally don't have a lot of experience at jobs outside of Facebook and academia) agrees that Facebook offers you unparalleled freedom to go forth and have impact, unencumbered by red tape and naysayers.
That's not to defend API breakages or incomplete documentation and the pain it causes developers -- I'm not directly involved, but I know that we're definitely trying to get that turned around and fix some of the issues with Facebook Platform.
Posted by
indigoviolet on Thursday July 07, 2011 @09:06PM
from the developers.facebook.com dept.
134 points, 76 comments, and maybe 3 of them critically examining the methodology :/
Posted by
indigoviolet on Friday June 10, 2011 @06:37AM
from the blogs.forbes.com dept.
Actually, we're mostly the mouth, teeth and tongue of Big Brother. Which He then uses to eat babies. And His teeth are sharp indeed.
You're perhaps right. Of course, these people are on things like Facebook, Twitter and blogs and if you can narrow down age, gender, location and medical condition, you might be able to correlate with public posts.
You can also look for specific people in there if you have certain kinds of prior information about them: For example, Aravind Narayanan was able to de-anonymize some part of the Netflix set [http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0610105]. Maybe that won't translate to this data.
Oooh. This is just begging for a privacy firestorm when someone de-anonymizes the data, which I'm guessing won't be super hard given the kind of medical features they'd need to provide to make this task useful.
A bandersnatch ate the anti-hacking chip we'd installed.
This is a possibility, I'd have to ask around to see it is the case. If so, I apologize for the snarky tone in my first comment.
That box searches the web. It even uses Bing.
You know what would be cool? If the author went to www.facebook.com, found the rather prominent input box on top called 'Search', and tried putting something in it.
There's a lot that can be improved, but Facebook already has a search engine. One that even produces Bing results, like the OP wants.
Thanks, that's cool. I'll post it on our team group.
Sorry I didn't respond earlier. We work on basically any data-analysis-intensive part of the site, including basic research into what people are using the site for, how features proliferate, deduping and disambiguation on the graph, machine learning, recommendations.
My Facebook profile is on my HN profile, and is the best way to contact me.
Not sure why, but I didn't get your message on Facebook.
(I work on this team at Facebook)
There are definitely sensitive issues, but IMO the limiting factor to putting out more cool analyses is that packaging these up for public consumption takes time and effort, and there is a _lot_ on our plate for a small team. Lisa (the author) was a very smart and productive intern.
If you're qualified and want to help, drop me a line or go to facebook.com/careers
It's interesting how noone wants to actually respond to the arguments that Mike Vernal is making, instead resorting to the equivalent of "Facebook is evil, how dare they say they aren't!".
Why can't you just get them from Gmail?