News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

inconvenient

Re:Ask HN: Please review my startup on Thursday April 23, 2009 @10:16PM (#576851)
Overall, it seems to work pretty well. Under "prettyURL", the "Tiny URL" is often longer than the "Meaning URL". Use a shorter hash key. Also, you might want to have some basic content that loads instantly along with the "loading" graphic (e.g. Logo, basic description).

What user base are you going for, and how to you plan to monetize it?

Re:Apple Posts Its Best Second Quarter Earnings Ever on Wednesday April 22, 2009 @07:23PM (#574765)
I'd love to hear the recession doom-and-gloomers explain this one.
Re:Simulated brain closer to thought on Wednesday April 22, 2009 @03:07PM (#574355)
I'm just extrapolating. Given exponential increases in computational power, it's a pretty small jump, I think, to imagine full brain simulation from what they're doing.
Re:Simulated brain closer to thought on Wednesday April 22, 2009 @01:57PM (#574227)
If they simulate my brain molecule by molecule, and consciousness emerges, which one is really me? If my physical self is then killed, do I in fact still exist inside the simulation? In which case, is it OK to kill off my superfluous physical presence in order to use my organs to help others? What rights does the simulated me have?

This will be a huge can of worms one day.

I don't get this. Wouldn't most of YouTube's traffic be downstream from Google's servers to the hoards of individual internet viewers all over the world? How exactly does peering help?
More like, Microsoft determined that people who chat actively on MSN messenger are linked by 6.6 degrees of separation. It's just not as interesting a story with those pesky details added in, is it?