impjohn

I think it could be read as the opposite. Could be read as: "We still have 6B people that could use a subscription"

I think I understand your point, and it certainly is true if you get in the right mindset with the right anectadata to back it up. But I feel it's leaving a lot on the table. Result oriented people are key to linking the technical with the real world. It's a bit of a wide statement to say that everyone who likes end result is impatient superficial or consumption driver.

I agree that there's a decent overlap here, and that your point stands. But there's a lot of merit in getting real products out there, vibe coded or not. Market forces then dictate value.

To be fair, I think you can't hand a role over to someone you just hired and walk away for a week. No matter how much of a SME they are. Let's not forget human onboarding takes months. With the advantage of their knowledge not going into the void multiple times a day. That's likely the last missing piece, a solid system of memories that produces the same effect as short/long term memories in a person.

This take may be frowned upon in HN, but I suspect it's much closer to the median sentiment.

>If they try a DOS attack on my time and sanity, I can reciprocate.

Isn't it better just to tell them that instead of passive aggressively continuing the cycle? Granted, though, harder to navigate.

>artisanal home made slop

Even in the depths of corporate life, the last beacon of light was interacting with a person who may be similarly philosophically placed as you, sharing something. Artisanal home made slop may be more underrated that people think, its a proxy for human connection, which surprise surprise, is a big basis of life

Maybe AI should replace some people.

I find this to be my current number 1 challenge when working on a terminal and seeking explanations for why a problem was approached in that way. the terminal only holds so many lines at once. Let's not talk about current scrolling in terminals.

It's interesting that the LLM will oblige my succinctness requests for one or two replies then back to 7 paragraph answers that I can't reply to point by point in a TUI.

Very cool. Explored a lot of nodes, rekindled some old bands. I was wondering how this was vibe coded, since it was done so well, art wise. Then I read your post. This has such a different feel for whatever is usually made today, I really enjoyed it. Cheers

Your take is cynical, but sensible in a massive org with dysfunctional culture that jades and burns out engineers until they only care about their own personal gains and everything else is secondary. I think people project their values in situations that don't have place for them and get upset

Reminds me of this case: https://iqf.ie/the-man-who-stole-100-million-from-google-and...

This opens that surface area of attack again, but now on a much larger scale, if not careful

That kind of captcha has a very short half life. Software ate the world now AI is eating software

Code gets stale really fast. Re-gathering context and re-aligning on old code is sometimes more painful than starting from scratch.

I'd say there's bottlenecks within the developer processes without even considering org processes. Code review, release, post release ceremonies. Feels like they absorb much of the gained productivity in the coding phase.

I believe it's ultimately a tug of war between what the business wants (more features, faster, etc) and the engineers want (maintainability, documentation, scalable patterns etc). Engineers rarely win this tug of war. At times it feels like watching a car crash in slow motion. I don't think this trend will meaningfully slow or change, until businesses interests are hit. That may take a while for this cruft to start causing pain. Even then, you may just throw money at the problem, or just live with it. Will companies go bankrupt because of vibe coding? I don't think so, and that's why ai coding is here to stay. My 2 cents

I believe the economic machine gives an edge to people who do more right things than wrong. Bob does things wrong, but given a 10x amount of output, the balance of right output vs wrong output may still be favored upon by the economy. A speculation, to be sure, we'll have to see how it pans out.

I think this will become the prevailing sentiment when the dust settles.

AI writing feels like putting a michelin course into a blender and drinking it

Then this person better bet their entire life savings on them dying, since it would reduce incentive (profit). Crazy thought experiment, gave me lots to think about

This is what struck me as well. I got weird undertones of 'Now you don't even need to have real memories! Just fabricate them.' They even prominently showcase edits of placing you with another person, further deepening disingenuous or parasocial relationships

>then tell it to give you the top 10 things wrong with the code, then tell it to fix the five of them that are valid and important.

I would be cautious of this. I've tried this multiple times and often it produces very subtle bugs. Sometimes the code is not bad enough to have 5 defects with it, but it will comply, and change things that don't need to. You will find out in prod at some point.

Crappy spreadsheet is just the codification of business processes. Those are inherently messy and there's lots of assumptions, lots of edge cases. That's why spreadsheets tend towards crappy on a long enough timeline. It's a fundamentally messy problem.

Spreadsheets are an abstraction over a messy reality, lossy. They were already generalizing reality.

Now we generalize the generalization. It is this lossy reality that people are worried about with AI in HN.

>but couldn't care less if it disappeared tomorrow.

Wonder how true that is. Some things incorporate in your life so subtly that you only become aware of them when totally switched off.

What were the clues, in hindsight?

I wonder if someone can get scent of 'want you to fail' early, so one can play their cards a bit differently armed with this knowledge.

It's hard to appreciate the difference in 'abundance mentality' between the median US and EU person. It always struck me as an interesting culture difference. While both EU and US grew in prosperity post WWII, I feel the US narrative was quite on another level.

Interesting thought. Do you have any anecdotes regarding it? Seems you're basing it off personal experience or something you've heard many times, curious to know what that is

I've been personally surprised that this doesn't come up more often. Most mature codebases span a decade or more, and especially in the web, there's so many layers of evolving technologies that were introduced during this time, resulting in complex geological layers forming in the codebase as the patterns evolved. That is not only a lot of lines of code, but a lot of nuance as well. Even a basic problem like routing can make these AIs fall flat on their face because of the sheer context and complexities involved

I believe impact relates to area of circle as defined by the radius. A pyramid is a more hierarchical approach that perhaps was not suited. My 0.02$