illiilliiililil

Why couldn't he breathe in the back of the car?

You speak on the virus as if you have expertise, or have studied the subject. Yet I suspect you, and so many posters here, are mere podcast listeners. The arrogance is almost a virus in spirit.

Have you poured over the literature? Where are you getting this information? Do you think China is open and transparent and wouldn't cook their books?

The way HN comes down so hard against the lab leak hypothesis is spooky. Opinion about this is thrown around so heavily. Credentials: NPR listener AKA elite understander of things? The tide of understanding the origin of this virus is turning as Chinese propaganda wears thin. Many of you may recieve your comeuppance and I hope you're embarassed by your sheepishness.

I wonder if Antifa is one such organization, just a dystopian one, a confederacy of angst.

>That's more recent, to be honest. When I started reading HN, it was very very libertarian (but mostly non-political).

Interesting. I came here a bit late.

There has never been such a thing as a politically neutral HN. It's just that there wasn't until recently a userbase to counteract the liberal tech groupthink.

As for myself, I found it a totally boring read. I understand its place in classrooms though. And I'm glad the society depicted is dead and gone.

The 1619 Project was such an awful bit of journalism. Totally not surprised it won a Pulitzer.

What outlets come to your mind as good, unbiased? I'm assuming already that you think that reality just has a liberal bias.

"Sources say..."

Bye!

I mean, did the post-modernists who read his paper know what post-modernism was?

Are you one of those who thought Sokal made good points in his submitted paper.

John Searle makes sense when wiriting on the mind. Jacques Derrida, who I have read, does not. The post-modernists are obscurantist charlatans who en masse form an institution that demands attention rather than the quick dismissal like one would give a rambling bum on the street. Similar to religious apologists they have created an enormous enterprise of bullshit. You are confusing its nebulousness for profundity.

Are you saying I should refrain from atheism until I have read Summa Theologica?

Don't sweat it. Derrida doesn't even understand Derrida.

The pomo people telling the anti-pomo they just haven't the understanding is reminiscent of religious apologists/theologians telling atheist debaters they just haven't ground to stand on because they haven't adequately digested a sufficient body of obscure tomes to dismiss X religion. Or "You just haven't read the Koran in classical Arabic! Understanding Islam is beyond you."

When I have connectivity issues during a pandemic I make sure at LEAST 6 techs come to make sure I have perfect connectivity to Netflix and chill.

Ironic story, coming from Buzzfeed.