News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

iliasam

Re:Open Source MCU-Based SDR GPS Receiver on Tuesday March 12, 2024 @12:46PM (#39681686)
This is a project of software GPS receiver for STM32.

No commercial "black box" GPS receiver module or FPGA is needed to to build GPS receiver - just MAX2769 RF Frontend IC and STM32 MCU.

Also I have same project for ESP32 - with GUI: https://github.com/iliasam/ESP32_SDR_GPS

This is a demo project - it can't be used in a real life because it is working too slow, but I think that it can be interesting for all who loves experiments with GPS, SDR and DSP.

Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Thursday March 12, 2020 @01:29PM (#22559335)
> "What is the limiting factor on the precision"

Precision in this project is limited by rise time of the received signal. Meanwhile, this time is limited by rise time of laser's current. It is too long now - 10 ns.

Theoretical TDC resolution is ~13mm per BIN.

You could see real results here: https://github.com/iliasam/OpenTOFLidar/wiki/Resolution-of-t...

> "How did you calculate the appropriate laser lens and standoff"

I can't say that there was too much calculations.

The is some information here: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/tiduc73b/tiduc73b.pdf (part 2.3.5)

and here: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/tiducm1b/tiducm1b.pdf (part 2.3.2)

Laser's lens should have maximum possible focal length, but it must not crop light beam from the diode.

Photodiode's lens should have maximum Entrance pupil

> "Is the CS mount lens's focal length important, or is there no need for a sharp image at all distances?"

You need to have sharp image at big distances. At short distances it is not important - light signal is high enough.

> "Why use one CS-mount lens and one M12 lens, rather than two M12 lenses?"

I think that it is easier to find lens with big "Entrance pupil" with CS mount that with M12 mount. Bigger mount - bigger lens diameter, bigger "Entrance pupil".

> "Do you need any sort of dynamic gain"

I don't have any kind of electrical gain control. There is an ability to change APD gain, but I don't use it.

> "optical filtering on the received signal"

I don't have filter in my LIDAR, but it is necessary to have it if you are going to run LIDAR at sunlight. I give links to a several interference filters in "LidarTotalBOM.xlsx".

> "Did you need much fancy $$$$ test equipment to get the design working".

All that I have is Tektronix TDS540D oscilloscope (bought at the Ebay for $300) and multimeter.

Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Thursday March 12, 2020 @07:18AM (#22555610)
I think that it is possible to make own polygonal mirror (cut polygonal mirror holder at CNC, attach flat mirrors and balance it). Also it may be found in stationary barcode reader. But you will lose field of view with polygonal mirror.
Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Thursday March 12, 2020 @06:00AM (#22555230)
In fact there is still many kinds of information that could not be found in Google.
Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Thursday March 12, 2020 @04:27AM (#22554821)
Thanks, I have never heard about it.
Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Thursday March 12, 2020 @04:24AM (#22554811)
As it was answered, you could read about safety here: https://github.com/iliasam/OpenTOFLidar/wiki/Laser-Safety

Measuring through translucent or transparent surfaces is theoretically possible (TDC is supporting multiple measurements), but received pulse width is too high now - it could be > 30ns after amplifier.

Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Thursday March 12, 2020 @04:18AM (#22554780)
Here is a link to the video: https://youtu.be/lTPH_Xa9yCk with short Lidar description. What kind of details do you want to know?

Why did you write "they are using"? Thre was no team, it's my own project.

Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Thursday March 12, 2020 @02:14AM (#22554240)
Thank you for reply!
Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @11:31PM (#22553438)
Discussion about my previous project: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16756901 was much bigger in comparison with this project - this is surprising me.
Re:Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @03:13PM (#22549318)
I'm surprised that there is absolutely no comments. Does that mean that this project is really not interesting?
Re:OpenSimpleLidar on Thursday April 05, 2018 @07:54AM (#16763918)
Neato and Xiaomi vacuum cleaners have integrated Lidars.
Re:OpenSimpleLidar on Thursday April 05, 2018 @06:43AM (#16763563)
Laser is rotating fast enough so it is less dangerous. Also laser current is modulated, so laser's average power decreased twice.
Re:OpenSimpleLidar on Thursday April 05, 2018 @12:24AM (#16761755)
Hi everyone. I am the author of the OpenSimpleLidar. If you have any questions about this project, you can ask them here.

Here is another my Lidar project: https://github.com/iliasam/OpenLIDAR

That project has a wiki: https://github.com/iliasam/OpenLIDAR/wiki

A big article in Russian about it: https://geektimes.ru/post/275442/