ihatethem

I don't know what you're talking about.

I don't see how private citizens discussing their political views is "substantive", there is nothing remotely controversial in that footage, this is just fodder for partisans.

While you're not being "facetious" you're being "glib".

Inbox was obviously a place the gmail team used for experimentation and now they are folding it back in.

Besides you're making it sound like there was some huge cost involved in adopting or in abandoning Inbox, which there isn't.

I don't understand why any of this was necessary in the first place, the only reason I can think of is this being on the wishlist of a powerful lobbying bloc.

There is something suspect about the EU's cavalier attitude in churning out internet regulations, they generally favor old industries and incumbents.

Of course the NYT would publish a 1k word profile of a virtual nobody as long as they're criticizing big bad tech companies.

Tech companies are only an issue for the newspaper business, they are a boon for the economy as a whole.