ianseyer
- the article, clearly expressing the intent of its own mistakes and contextualizing them in the era of LLM-borne "perfect" text
You could take a piece of paper (much larger than the picture/book), and cut out a waldo-shaped hole it and position the paper such that he is shown in the hole. Then, when you show it to the challenger, they know that you have found him without you revealing where he is.
https://www.thebrandingjournal.com/2015/05/what-to-learn-fro...
While there were definitely lax restrictions here, there are more factors here (societal pressure, both cultural and literal; the article indicated that study groups and other activities were coordinated solely on social media) that affect one's proneness to phone addiction.
In addition, in the article linked above (and others), parenting is not _the_ bellwether preventative in terms of phone addiction - there are psychological factors, environmental factors, etc.
In addition, there are societal variations across gender that are documented as having an affect on proneness to phone addiction.
Don't let your individual experience override the reality of the situation. This is an issue that is going to require extensive research and potentially regulation.
There is a multi-billion dollar concerted effort by the largest companies in the world to get an iron grip on the attention of children at a level of granularity never before seen - don't pretend like that isn't a novel cultural force that should be reckoned with.
Really? This comment just seems like ego-driven parental grandstanding rather than an actual attempt to understand how the first generation born into the era of smartphones and all-the-time internet access might have difficulty negotiating a healthy psyche against a multi-billions dollar oligarchy of companies intentionally seeking to monetize their attention.
Congratulations, your son doesn't seem addicted to their ipod. Cool anecdote; here's actual data about wether or not parental control of phone use has much of an affect on phone addiction (it doesn't): https://journals.lww.com/jan/fulltext/2018/04000/does_parent...
Location: Austin, TX
Remote: Yes please
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: AWS/GCP, Docker, K8S, etc
Resume/CV: https://tinyurl.com/qowwkpv
Development began in 2002, and the main author says 1.0 will be out in 14 years!
Extremely complex generative world with a vi-flavored interface. The game itself is like no man's sky/Minecraft.
Also, this is not an argument _against_ containerization. You make no argument or show any evidence of performance benefits bare v. docker.
1. Every system has vulnerabilities. You can defend against them.
2. Any improperly configured system can be abused. In particular, the exploit you linked can be completely stopped with a litany of ways. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16030107
Your argument going from "containers are unfit for production, you'll mature out of them one day" to "here's a small, preventable vulnerability" seems more like a security non-sequiter than an actual argument against containerization.
Further, claiming containers are not production ready is empirically and literally negated by them used, in production, by the largest tech companies that have ever existed.
- the passwords aren't stored in plaintext or any other compromised hashing mechanism
- you autogenerated your password
- your password manager does not get compromised
saying "it actually does" is a bit of absolutist stretch...
I believe it is important to be vigilant and critical when it comes to three letter acronyms.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/09/28/4956945...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/senators-call-...
https://www.vox.com/2016/9/28/13059538/fda-drug-regulation-r...
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160927/NEWS/160929...
Especially now that phones have adopted USB-C, I have to have both a C and micro charger.