iamjbn

Search engine backend specs are almost final & now open source (AquilaDB), we love to make more and more of it on the way. This is because we're still discovering a market-fit & final product shape - open source development need a finalized spec & consistency over time.

Just wait until cheap to write GPT3 articles learn SEO techniques inherently and bombard the internet suppressing human writers in the spam ocean. At https://aquila.network we’re always thinking of this scenario.

Just wait until cheap to write GPT3 articles learn SEO techniques inherently and bombard the internet suppressing human writers in the spam ocean. At https://aquila.network we’re always thinking of this scenario.

Try this one: https://t.me/aquilanet_bot

BotMark: A Telegram bot for quick bookmarking & powerful search (works in groups as well)

For Individuals: When you find an interesting website/article on your mobile phone, press the share button and select "botmark"—nothing more, nothing less.

For Groups: Add "botmark" to a group and keep track of all the links in your group in one place—easy peasy.

If you need a good search engine, pay for it. Business needs to make money, it’s that simple.

Integrate Bitcoin into your business and all the arguments in the write up just unwind.

It's interesting to see that you have paid for Kagi. Do you regularly pay for any other services that are privacy-focused?

Anonymous payment is a good idea. Do you use any other service that supports anonymous payments?

Adding to the list I have been building for very long -- "Becoming irrelevant, Google Search" -- here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cSMY5wXSKhJdMxeJEvTUJ21e...

I might be dumb, but Why?

Great work.

Thanks for sharing. I have been working on vector search engines (IR) for a while (Aquila Network). And I believe works such as this as well as the "differential neural computers" (couple of them from Deepmind) will be the next breakthrough in IR. I can't see the direct path yet. We're eagerly waiting to see somewhat a usable architecture yet. I believe current vector indexes will eventually get modified into hierarchical random access memories that stores compressed information in higher dimensions (static & replicated part of the distributed system). On top of this, an application specific information decoder (that's the dynamic part of the system, UX) will use the underlying information accordingly.

Yes that might be true, I'm just collecting information.

Thanks for this article. Adding to other "Google is dying" discussions that I have collected over time as part of my personal research: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cSMY5wXSKhJdMxeJEvTUJ21e...

Agree, Mullvad provides really good VPN service. I faced almost zero downtimes / speed throttles. It establishes quick connection with server (maybe because it uses wireguard). Anyway, I'm a regular user and I think paying 5E worth it.

In my opinion, Google's way of doing information organization worked really good in the past, now it's time to move on. The same system that separated signal from noise is now helping to generate too much noise while trying to fight it at the same time.

Search should be the native feature of the Web itself (even if it's just basic), just like any other discovery protocol.

No problem, I really appreciate it. Definitely going to work on that.

Glad to see that many people share the same feeling that pushed us to do this in the first place - until this point, we were skeptical about whether it existed or not.

We're planning to double down on the features that supports a feedback loop from consumers to creators.

We wanted to build this product in a way to provide more value to the content creators, while benefiting content consumers. We hope with this, creators will get direct exposure to their follower's taste and expectations.

Thanks for your time, much valuable information. Have a nice day!