News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

hnbro

"worldwide apex predator" == "good at it (being animals)" ?
Re:Staying with the US Digital Service on Thursday January 19, 2017 @12:22AM (#13433239)
if not this person, someone else will. so it just boils down to asking what his personal political views are.
Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @11:33PM (#13433038)
not everyone can be dirk nowitzki :(
Re:My Go Resolutions for 2017 on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @10:27PM (#13432730)
> you have to handle them

the definition of "handle" widely varies, to the point of making the exercise near meaningless.

Re:Rust vs. Go on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @10:23PM (#13432705)
it's unfortunate that rust seems barely more than a compiler. it's... empty. the "ecosystem" feels like a namespace-free dogpile of college spring break experiments. a wasteland of pre-pre-pre-pre-alpha 0.0.0.0.0.1 stuff. it'll be 10 years before it improves to even being underwhelming.

in go, you can download it and have the pieces to actually do useful stuff right away. legit productivity. not to mention putting together graphs or graph-like structures and other similar things aren't the obtuse sphinx riddles they are in rust.

Re:Rust vs. Go on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @09:11PM (#13432379)
who is "esr" and why do you accuse them of such things?

edit: oh, the The Cathedral and the Bazaar dude. i saw a video about him that seemed to portray him well. but having found his blog... well... i can understand your sentiment.

Re:Rust vs. Go on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @09:07PM (#13432362)
can go (or rust) compile for targets that don't have a jvm?
Re:Rust vs. Go on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @08:33PM (#13432196)
when i first saw d (years back), it merely seemed like an attempted c+++.

the syntax seemed extremely similar, as if they took c++ and just tweaked it a bit, rather than working at least somewhat from first principles.

seemed almost comically pointless at the time. no doubt it's evolved since then.

why would someone think it was "compact disc"? even if a hn reader was somehow completely ignorant of continuous delivery, the context and usage should be a guide.
Re:Obama Commutes Bulk of Chelsea Manning’s Sentence on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @01:50AM (#13424598)
what does "feeling female" mean?
Re:Obama Commutes Bulk of Chelsea Manning’s Sentence on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @01:45AM (#13424583)
i guess it's always good to have an exit strategy.
Re:Obama Commutes Bulk of Chelsea Manning’s Sentence on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @01:28AM (#13424505)
i think it's only odd to some because of prescriptive "style guide" insistence over the years. it makes a great deal of sense.
Re:Obama Commutes Bulk of Chelsea Manning’s Sentence on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @01:26AM (#13424497)
does "they" imply a gender?
Re:I'm at Fog Creek, and we're introducing Gomix on Saturday December 31, 2016 @06:52PM (#13293856)
this is both reductive and a red herring.
Re:In 2017, I’m going to stop watching the news on Saturday December 31, 2016 @06:51PM (#13293851)
i'm inclined to think there is no such thing as a "free press". i'm also of a mind that even when one presumes such a thing exists, there's no reason to believe that this leads to "truth" or "reliability" in reporting.

i hope there's a third way between corporate news and government news.

Re:In 2017, I’m going to stop watching the news on Saturday December 31, 2016 @01:24PM (#13292323)
i think trump's win had a lot less to do with trump himself than other factors.
Re:In 2017, I’m going to stop watching the news on Saturday December 31, 2016 @01:23PM (#13292310)
do you have "strong political views"?
Re:I'm at Fog Creek, and we're introducing Gomix on Saturday December 31, 2016 @01:01PM (#13292190)
"efficient" is an overloaded term, and depending on your meaning it's not something everyone's pursuing.
Re:I'm at Fog Creek, and we're introducing Gomix on Saturday December 31, 2016 @12:34PM (#13292041)
> That seemed pretty absurd

...why?

one-sided reporting as usual.
Re:Xi editor: A modern editor with a backend written in Rust on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @11:15AM (#11581123)
or shii or zee or
> something relatively trivial like Twitter has 4000 people

there is more to twitter than the web app you type dozen words into.

i don't much about them (including whether 4000 is accurate), but presumably there's a lot to work on regarding international near-realtime messaging infrastructure, high availability, machine learning, sentiment analysis, smart advertising systems, yadda yadda. 4k does seem like a lot, but i doubt their suits are interested in needlessly hiring people to sit around picking their nose.

> despite the fact that every single game, which made a significant critical/financial impact had a period of crunch

this argument doesn't necessarily disprove the notion. it's plausible to suggest that whatever impact they had was mitigated to some degree.

Re:Why C++ sucks (2016 edition) on Tuesday February 23, 2016 @11:21AM (#11159927)
a coincidence, but whatever.
Re:Why C++ sucks (2016 edition) on Monday February 22, 2016 @07:40PM (#11155546)
i think having known bounds would make arrays a non-zero cost abstraction.
Re:Why C++ sucks (2016 edition) on Monday February 22, 2016 @07:15PM (#11155436)
perhaps "unobvious" to you, but that's something which is empirically (if subjectively) resolvable, no?
Re:Why C++ sucks (2016 edition) on Monday February 22, 2016 @07:10PM (#11155417)
well, you would, you're in games. fairly substantial amount of stockholm syndrome in game programmers, imo. ;-)

bjarne and others in the community have talked about the heavy cost of legacy and compatibility many times. it's okay to like the language but acknowledge that it's not as awesome as it theoretically could be. it's okay to be unhappy with the warts and weirdness -- after all, such things are what the committee needs to be mindful of when progressing the language.

there's no real reason a language can't outright replace c++ without having many (most? all?) of it's idiosyncrasies. rust is a decent attempt, though the memory safety ideology seems too high friction to properly replace c++. there might be others who give it a shot someday.

Re:Why C++ sucks (2016 edition) on Monday February 22, 2016 @06:43PM (#11155288)
how dare they.
Re:Lodash 4.0.0 is out on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @10:52PM (#10892222)
yum makes rpm easymode!

Older »