hansword
"if stuff doesn't cut both ways, find out why it doesn't"
Datasheet: https://www.sonics.com/site/assets/files/2949/spin-welder.pd...
I just checked with the datasheet of a current commercial spin welder.[0] The rpm's given on the datasheet are 500 to 2500. I think the author might have slightly exaggerated the capabilities of their 1970s toy for effect.
[0] https://www.sonics.com/site/assets/files/2949/spin-welder.pd...
Cause this sounds like something I read a few months ago. A pretty silly plan.
Reflected sun, by definition, has a little less energy than direct sun. So, given the mirror walls are straight, as the designs show, you get (at maximum) 200% of normal desert sun energy, which isn't comfortable, but not a Gehry-style death ray.
But I sit on the other side. I hate it and will tell everyone how much I hate it.
--- Edit:
Or, if you prefer, in market terms: Because I am not alone, there is a market for non-clickbaity titles, non-exaggerated thumbs, and there are channels that cater to this market.
- Tom7 / Suckerpinch - it feels like hackernews catnip to me
It's an entertainment channel, and if you want light science entertainment, and expect to forget everything within a few hours, it's a good channel. If you want a science/learning/education channel, it isn't.
You don't want the underside of the computer to reach substantially over 40deg for a considerable amount of time. This is because some people put their laptop on their lap and if it is too hot, it starts slowly cooking the leg. This has happened before, and thus nowadays, all new computers make sure the underside doesn't exceed 40deg for longer periods.
So I wouldn't be surprised if the people on YouTube traded performance for on-lap-safety. Apple can't, for obvious reasons.
shut-up-and-take-my-money.jpg
Where do I sign? Can we make it same-day delivery?
But I am not sure if I understood it correctly. This might be more for different level of comprehension (eli5?).
A proper title for HN, imo, would be "A personal fitness trainer is the best investment".
I wouldn't have clicked on that one and saved myself from reading an article that is irrelevant to me.
If your task is "show me something that breaks through our hyperspeed media", then I guess some obscure museum is a better place than an ML model.
If your task is "find the best variation on theme X" or "quick draft visualization", they are often very useful. I am sure there will be many further tasks to which current and future models will be well suited. They are not magic picture machines. At least not yet.
Hope it is that easy for you, and it isn't a bigger problem.
A contemporary CPU and/or GPU is 'a bunch of connections that are pre-encoded' - just not in DNA, but in silicon.
There is a chance.
To get a better answer, you have to specify what exactly you mean by 'sampled' and by 'without context local to the code in question'.
The most basic, most broken down, most simplified answer is what is called "poverty of stimulus".
A NN has an abundance of stimuli, orders of magnitude greater than any biological being could ever possibly take in. Finding enough correlations (enough for productivity) in such abundance is not actually that surprising. What is surprising is kids being competent at speech after less than 2000 days of stimuli, often really low-quality stimuli.