goptimize

Unfortunately, you arguments suggest that you will never understand Figure 2.

FUD is a way to make money from uninformed public which still apparently has some money

They did it before Telegram ICO was announced so it is not an evidence. Now, they have no other financially profitable choice but to make FUD to increase the likelihood of Telegram's fail. I don't say it is bad, it is just a better description of the events.

They invested in competitors

Try to read the actual article. Your comment is based on a few paragraphs you found and defigured for your own satisfaction.

Maarten Schenk (resident expert on fake news) create click-bait titles

It is described as Evolution Strategies (proposed in the 1970s) which adapt individual mutation rates depending on the search landscape at hand. Unfortunately, biologist will learn about in a few decades at best.

even more it is a joke to talk about being financially strong=independent, it is a puppet / outsourced browser organization

You are not financially stronger if one day most of your income will come from a source which you are expected to strongly protect from.

another comment provided a good explanation (see below), now it remains to check the editor

"Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr. van Dam received a research grant from the Nestec Company. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported." Guys, Nestec own the world's biggest coffee machine company, Nespresso.

thanks for pointing out, I corrected it

this comment included a mistake

A review process shorter than 2 months is an extremely rare thing in scientific journal from CS fields to Nature journals. Most often it happens with shitty journals and / or when the editor has a horse in the race.

Received August 27, 2013. Revision received October 23, 2013. Accepted October 24, 2013.

Sounds like a trashjournal which would explain pretty much everything.

Correction: not a trash journal, still the review process was super fast

when time goes to infinity which is a shitty guarantee

I didn't know that there was an accusation because we was Jewish. I meant that he was plagiarist and it has nothing to do with his origins and beliefs.

It would be sufficient for media to launch shitstorm again.

As a plagiarist he had to suffer. Don't tell me you have no clue what I am talking about.

Median instead of Average would be most illustrative

"my freelance work had picked up considerably" - she might simply be ready to move on

"is no longer convinced" - that is very cheap

If they use Amazon servers, NSA can get data from Amazon without dealing with DDG at all.

Tor is designed to make sure that the most active sheeples stay close and so it is cheaper to deal with them.

"We’re talking about a company that had 1500 employees, with just around a dozen on the infrastructure team" - what the rest 99% of the company is doing, marketing?

"One of your key premises, that investing in startups is a key / good path to getting rich, is flawed" - straw man argument

Yep, 26 is also a numerical value of YHVH, i.e., Yahweh :)

LLC cannot issue stock, right? If you buy back all stocks then you don't need to provide detailed public reports except to major stockholders?

The following sentence sounds like they plan to achieve a less transparent situation "The switch is partly related to Google’s transformation from a listed public company into a business owned by a holding company" therefore they buy back their stocks.

Christmas in Russia is celebrated on 7 January