gnykka
Show HN: I made Chrome extension to check grammar in Twitter posts with ChatGPT
Show HN: I Made a Visualization of MoMA Artists of 20 Century
https://gnykka.io/moma-artists
I took the official dataset (1) from MoMA and visualized the artists who have at least one drawing in the museum's collection and lived in 20 century.The X axis represents the year of birth, Y — lifespan, size — count of works, color — gender.(1) https://github.com/MuseumofModernArt/collection/tree/master
Re:Show HN: I made a Chrome extension to add flying snowflakes to all ...
on Sunday January 03, 2021 @08:38AM (#25621679)
Thanks! Yes, you are right. Whitelist or blacklist option is a good idea
Show HN: I made a Chrome extension to add flying snowflakes to all the webpages
Re:Show HN: Canvas engines performance comparison – PixiJS, Two.js, an...
on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @06:54PM (#23086074)
I simply loved the examples on paper.js webpage and just wanted to try it
Re:Show HN: Canvas engines performance comparison – PixiJS, Two.js, an...
on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @05:50PM (#23085499)
Actually I made a switch at first as I started with Two.js and there are 3 types (svg, canvas and webgl). But then there was Paper.js which only had simple canvas so I removed the switch at all and used the fastest renderers for every engine (webgl or canvas).
Re:Show HN: Canvas engines performance comparison – PixiJS, Two.js, an...
on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @05:47PM (#23085466)
I wasn't thinking about this as a menu, this are just links to switch between renderers.
Count saving is a good point, I'll add this feature
Re:Show HN: Canvas engines performance comparison – PixiJS, Two.js, an...
on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @04:53PM (#23084929)
I made a change to loops to use for() cycle, thanks
Re:Show HN: Canvas engines performance comparison – PixiJS, Two.js, an...
on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @04:52PM (#23084916)
Good point. Usually I like to use map or reduce for arrays but here simple for is easier.
Re:Show HN: Canvas engines performance comparison – PixiJS, Two.js, an...
on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @04:42PM (#23084804)
My point was more to compare libraries than to create the best canvas performance. But you are right: simple plain canvas is usually pretty fast.
Re:Show HN: Canvas engines performance comparison – PixiJS, Two.js, an...
on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @04:04PM (#23084325)
WebGL is the fastest for now. But not all libraries and browsers support it
Re:Show HN: Canvas engines performance comparison – PixiJS, Two.js, an...
on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @04:03PM (#23084297)
Yes, I agree. I also found out that Two.js redraws 5k elements even a little bit faster but it takes a couple of seconds to render them for the first time.