ginjas

Some combination of XMR <-> BTC atomic swaps (https://www.getmonero.org/2021/08/20/atomic-swaps.html the latter function not being implemented yet) and non-KYC exchanges.

>Would you please stop posting flamewar comments

Sure, my rhetotic got kinda out of line. I get excited debating.

>and using HN for ideological battle

I reject the characterization, it's almost implying I have an end with these posts besides putting a point of view that's at least an alternative to status quo that can make people realize they don't have any skin in the game, and that the US State Dept. has. I also don't. I don't really care about the outcome of the war.

>If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

I'll do that then. Thanks for the heads up.

I mean, if your only criteria is the intensity of the quality, then kinda.

But... :

(persecuted journalist)

>https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-61839256

>https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2013/07/usa-must-not-...

(jails its opposition)

>https://eu.usatoday.com/storytelling/capitol-riot-mob-arrest...

>"hatespeech" (newspeak)

>fraudulent elections: funny how the concerns that 'half' of the US had with elections were dismissed. Especially when conditions were different, by using a method usually agreed (until now, cuz narrative) prone to tampering. So much for free and fair elections.

So _Zero_ huh?

>Your conclusion that "There is no right to protest anywhere" is simply ridiculous.

BLM rioters did this, and more. Violence + Property damage + Corporate Backing + gov backing. They didn't had their donation money seized,and almost no resistance to establish order.

what I meant for the goading part was this:

Ukraine has self interests. Everyone has. But not everyone can actualize those, due to reality. The reality is that Ukraine neighbours a powerful hegemon.

Since international relations are anarchistic (due to not being a supra-entity that has authority over states [authority!=international courts bullsh*]), Ukraine hasn't any right (to its sovereign, that does not exist) to be sovereign. It has to go out and look for itself.

Ukraine thought that had the US/NATO back, that made it act in a more reckless way (kind of when you rely on your big brother type stuff). It escalated 'till it decided it wanted to join NATO. It was goaded.

>you can't use the threat of violence and then claim via realpolitik that the other side was in the wrong.

who says? That's your problem. You lack the 'anarchistic' framework of geopolitics.

Now, realpolitik-wise, Ukraine's self-interests (of being more independent of Russia thru NATO) did clash with Russia's self-interests of being safe (and probably made Russia have a expansionary Casus Belli).

I feel that the US triggered and amplified the war, thru regime change in Ukraine (yep, maidan was a coup), recognizing aspirations of UA to NATO, making Zeleskyy too comfy to be more harsh in negotiations (where he had no leverage, cuz Ukraine's power small vs Rus.), ultimately resulted in unnecessary deaths, just for the purpose of sphere of influence expansion.

>so we supported them.

Even if it's reckless and could trigger something like this?

Also, I will play the 'reversed roles card' again. This time with a REAL example. Cuba. Was. The. Same. Thing.

That's why this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctrine.

US has the same pattern as Russia. It's actually incredible how close these are.

Unmasked as a shill for saying that great powers engage in propaganda, false flagging and dissent crushing.

I have no skin in the game. War, no war, it doesn't matter to me the outcome of this war to be honest.

EDIT: But if you are all moral highground, answer me this:

Why did the US goad Ukraine into taking a hostile stance against a neighbouring (and somewhat rival) great power? Whas this to the interest of Ukranians? Or to the geopolitical interests of US? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93eyhO8VTdg

>I reject the false equivalence of the DHS and FSB. Not gonna both-sides this, sorry.

lmao mkay. Not identical, but very similar. It's not even 'Alex Jones'-tier to say this. I think you forget you are if you are under US or (even NATO). YOU WILL hear propaganda from your side, as the Russians do. It's NORMAL. We live under control of a hegemon with self-interests.

May I have to remind you of these? And tell me the difference between these and Russian spookery:

>Assange was being hunted down by the US worldwide (https://diem25.org/exactly-10-years-ago-wikileaks-released-a...)

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM

I could go on, but the point was made already.

Edit: So yes, it's actually 'both sides'

Imo let's be real, drop the pretension. I'd rather we get off the notion that these things are possible. I.e. we are ruled by smart people (aristocracy), that enrich themselves, but that are smart and have skin in the game. Rather than dumb (and impressionable) collective deciding in a popularity contest, probably _extremely_ influenced by a 3rd party (media), pretending it's fulfilling its duty, while it's actually falling in some 'cool' 'wolf's' song, that only accomplishes short term gains, while mortgaging our future.

Just drop the pretension.

Edit: maybe I'm schizo-ranting, but in my opinion, this is a very sober/hyperconscious perspective, that should be had by everyone. Not this Plato's Cave bs, that we live in a 'free democracy' where nobody questions status quo, except a minority of right-left non-npc people.

>it's supposed to be the arbiter of civil rights, fairness, and enablement, with the convenient side effect of enriching a very small group of people who actually pull the strings

so the ends justify the means? Even the premise is wrong

Don't worry about the 'obscure' aspect. That's part of the aesthetic imo. Just install it, boot up a comment and go to this group:

~bitbet-bolbel/urbit-community

Justin Murphy also has a pretty cool guide here: https://imperceptible.computer/

You could boot a comet and message me (~piclyx-docsun) there with your HN name and I'll link you cool groups I'm in.

What I find weird about Urbit is that it isn't mainstream, but most groups I'm in are pretty active. The UI also adds to the experience, it is soothing.

Would be happy to show you more stuff.

Edit:

To answer the status, you could check the blog (https://urbit.org/blog) or you could join the network and follow the beginner groups (i.e. ~bitbet-bolbel/urbit-community).

Also, you'll notice this is my first comment and you'll think I'm shilling, which is understandable. I felt the need to comment cuz I felt the same way. I was tired of reddit and discord groups. I guess the quality of the content wasn't enough. In the urbit groups you'll find people who (imo) like heterodoxy and 'different' things.

Cool kids these days are using Urbit. It has the same style (p2p) and has a niche but active community of people interested in all kinds of areas, mainly tech, politics, aesthetics, etc.

If you find it 'gimmicky' which I don't, but lots do, just focus on the 'Groups' app.

https://urbit.org/getting-started

To communicate you need a 'ship' (an ID). This could be a free 'comet' and a paid planet. Layer 2 Planets are relatively cheap, and they'll be yours forever too, so it's just a one time payment.

You can find them here:

https://subject.network/buy/

https://azimuth.shop/ (3.5 bucks atm in this one)

https://wexpert.systems/

https://mocbel.house/

Any questions, lmk. (not affiliated, just a fan)