geforce
The effects of fasting on the human body are... fastinating! (Sorry!)
Your second scenario is like a dead man's switch. It's interesting, as it could prompt you with a daily challenge that only you can answer. But I don't see how it could be implemented in a normal person's life?
What hurts is when you decide to switch to another company, which has good rep, and finally find out: it's the same. Everywhere. After the big bosses do stupid shit, they get promoted elsewhere, leaves you fix the broken plates, rince and repeat until a merger, bankruptcy, or major reorg. Meanwhile middle management gets bigger and everything gets slower. Good employees leave, bad one get promoted to middle management, and you wonder why you're stupid enough to stay there.
Backstory: we produced a custom software that used Windows Embedded' LDAP library to handle the LDAP part (Winldap32 library with the Winldap.h headers). The machine running our software didn't join the domain, so it only authenticated the users with the ldap_bind function.
If I recall correctly, we found the ldap32 library referral problem when we used AdInsight (by Mark Russinovich) and saw the library was poking all around the place (the other forest DCs) and never completed any of the requests. I think we confirmed with Wireshark.
The hack was in 2 parts:
1) We made a DLL that offered the same ldap_* functions as those we used in our software. The library then redirected the LDAP calls to a python script that used a native ASN1/LDAP implementation which relied on nothing but pure python code.
2) Then we made a injection software that injected the DLL in our software at startup and replaced the Winldap32 functions with our DLL functions.
We then were able to bypass the MSFT' LDAP library problem, and I think we pretty close to our initial deadline in the end. Apart from the (very small) added latency on LDAP code, everything was fine in the end.
YMMV but for me some of these came naturally with time.
Digital radio [2] has it's advantages. For once, it's more efficient in it's use of the spectrum. In many densely populated towns, there is no (or not many) more spectrum left for new broadcasters.
It's a matter of time, and people will adapt and forget they "hated it and doesn't want to change".
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_terrestrial_television
> discutable, weird, questionable, shady
But as for net neutrality? Of course I'm sad. How are they going to check the sources of the articles? Wikipedia is still pretty limited in some areas of knowledge.
Nothing is perfect. I'm very happy they get to browse wikipedia. It is magnitude of order better than not having access to it.
I don't feel like many people are actually concerned of the implication of having an internet that isn't an internet anymore, but merely a handful of big companies hosting everyone.
Or maybe it's me who don't understand.
If this makes you laugh, you have probably never worked in the public sector or big corps.
I don't notice it much on my PC, since I've got a FTTH connection, but on LTE and 3G, it's very noticeable. Enough that I avoid certain websites. And that's nowhere near slow by his standards.
I do agree that everyone would benefit from slimmer websites.
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-failure-rates-q3-2...