News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

gdi2290

Nice
Re:Fix Redis Drama on Monday March 25, 2024 @09:29PM (#39823372)
I'm just arbitrarily reverting the license change without buy-in from Redis Inc.
Re:Realtime California Air Quality on Sunday August 23, 2020 @02:50PM (#24254279)
also see how bad the fires are from Santa Cruz https://twitter.com/robwormald/status/1296709260429029378
nice
This is great news for GraphQL adoption. I also really like the landing page design
(for everyone wondering, the insider info was simply a guess. Scaphold shutdown 4 months ago and suddenly AWS has something that looks just like it)
this is insider info ;)
They didn't copy the idea. They acquired scaphold.io which is like graphcool
AppSync is Scaphold
Re:Preact, React alternative without weird Patents License on Tuesday August 22, 2017 @04:55PM (#15076304)
Hi Danny, thanks for your insight about this topic. As someone who works with licensing at Google can I get an idea of what would happen in this scenario.

Let's say Facebook has a Patent on something like `Components`, `Unidirectional data flow`, and `virtual DOM` which were core to React (of course, we don't know for sure). Now let's say a framework built at Google using the same ideas as `Components` and `Unidirectional data flow` under MIT. From what I can find about patents is that if you have a Patent on the eraser then that prevents anyone from building the pencil or at least the eraser can sue for patent infringement. Does this mean the framework that was built at Google under MIT can still be affected by Facebook? If that were the case can we assume Facebook wouldn't sue Google for the same reason as start-up wouldn't want to sue Facebook for patent infringement? What if a startup were sued Facebook for patent infringement and Facebook counter-sues for patent infringement because of use of `Components` and `Unidirectional data flow` in the MIT Google framework do you think Google would step in to help since the startup wouldn't have enough money to take on the counter-sue?

The idea here is that no one knows for sure what Facebook has for Patents on React yet the core concepts that were introduced to the community is wide spread.

Disclaimer: Of course, this is just hypothetical and you're not my lawyer and this is not an official legal opinion nor the opinion of Google.

Re:Vote what you want the Webpack team to focus on on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @01:46PM (#13024768)
Re:Vote what you want the Webpack team to focus on on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @01:25PM (#13024584)
hey, you're a meme now https://imgflip.com/i/1ep7b0
http://angularclass.com has courses on Angular 2
if anyone has any questions about the course or what we covered feel free to ask them here
Re:Angular 2 Fundamentals Course on Friday July 29, 2016 @12:16PM (#12187850)
having the option to precompile your framework to 20kb file size which is smaller than some libraries feels like a great feature
Re:Angular 2 Fundamentals Course on Friday July 29, 2016 @12:08PM (#12187780)
Angular 2 is great, just look at all the features you get: WebWorker, Server-Side Rendering, mobile, progressive web application, Lazy loading support, Router, Material Components, Precompile your app. Tree-Shaking support, fast rendering, CLI, and TypeScript. The framework is backed by Google and Microsoft

Older »