gdi2290
gdi2290 on Hacker News
Posted by
gdi2290 on Monday September 16, 2024 @12:03PM
from the github.com dept.
I'm just arbitrarily reverting the license change without buy-in from Redis Inc.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Monday March 25, 2024 @12:39AM
from the github.com dept.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Sunday September 20, 2020 @01:54PM
from the github.com dept.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Sunday September 20, 2020 @01:53PM
from the github.com dept.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @02:27AM
from the github.com dept.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Sunday August 23, 2020 @02:50PM
from the twitter.com dept.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Sunday August 23, 2020 @02:33PM
from the purpleair.com dept.
This is great news for GraphQL adoption. I also really like the landing page design
(for everyone wondering, the insider info was simply a guess. Scaphold shutdown 4 months ago and suddenly AWS has something that looks just like it)
They didn't copy the idea. They acquired scaphold.io which is like graphcool
Posted by
gdi2290 on Friday September 15, 2017 @04:52PM
from the github.com dept.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Tuesday August 29, 2017 @01:03PM
from the onespeed.io dept.
Hi Danny, thanks for your insight about this topic. As someone who works with licensing at Google can I get an idea of what would happen in this scenario.
Let's say Facebook has a Patent on something like `Components`, `Unidirectional data flow`, and `virtual DOM` which were core to React (of course, we don't know for sure). Now let's say a framework built at Google using the same ideas as `Components` and `Unidirectional data flow` under MIT. From what I can find about patents is that if you have a Patent on the eraser then that prevents anyone from building the pencil or at least the eraser can sue for patent infringement. Does this mean the framework that was built at Google under MIT can still be affected by Facebook? If that were the case can we assume Facebook wouldn't sue Google for the same reason as start-up wouldn't want to sue Facebook for patent infringement? What if a startup were sued Facebook for patent infringement and Facebook counter-sues for patent infringement because of use of `Components` and `Unidirectional data flow` in the MIT Google framework do you think Google would step in to help since the startup wouldn't have enough money to take on the counter-sue?
The idea here is that no one knows for sure what Facebook has for Patents on React yet the core concepts that were introduced to the community is wide spread.
Disclaimer:
Of course, this is just hypothetical and you're not my lawyer and this is not an official legal opinion nor the opinion of Google.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Sunday August 20, 2017 @02:25PM
from the netflix.github.io dept.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Saturday August 19, 2017 @06:24PM
from the medium.com dept.
Posted by
gdi2290 on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @10:00AM
from the webpack.js.org dept.
if anyone has any questions about the course or what we covered feel free to ask them here
Posted by
gdi2290 on Wednesday August 03, 2016 @10:51AM
from the courses.angularclass.com dept.
having the option to precompile your framework to 20kb file size which is smaller than some libraries feels like a great feature
Angular 2 is great, just look at all the features you get: WebWorker, Server-Side Rendering, mobile, progressive web application, Lazy loading support, Router, Material Components, Precompile your app. Tree-Shaking support, fast rendering, CLI, and TypeScript. The framework is backed by Google and Microsoft
Posted by
gdi2290 on Saturday January 16, 2016 @10:16AM
from the twitter.com dept.