News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

garret

Re:Show HN: my Mac app just got fireballed on Thursday May 10, 2012 @11:39PM (#3957508)
How'd you do it?
Re:David Foster Wallace: The Big, Uncut Interview on Tuesday February 21, 2012 @01:30PM (#3617490)
Today would have been his 50th birthday.
Re:Why Startup Hubs Work on Wednesday October 05, 2011 @11:40PM (#3078927)
He did mention that Ron Conway would have know even more people.
Re:"This is water, this is water." on Sunday August 21, 2011 @03:05PM (#2909924)
Ad hominem.
Re:Ashton Kutcher Joins the Airbnb Team on Thursday May 26, 2011 @09:36AM (#2587639)
I know the drama kids didn't sit with the computer club kids at the high school lunch table

We did at my school.

Re:Paul Graham's wrong on the value of a hacker culture (sadly) on Wednesday November 17, 2010 @10:28AM (#1914504)
Hackers love to experiment in public.

http://www.apple.com/ipad/

Re:Is Microsoft in trouble? on Tuesday October 19, 2010 @09:03AM (#1806952)
Three and a half years ago: http://paulgraham.com/microsoft.html
Re:OkTrends: Gay Sex vs. Straight Sex on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @01:26PM (#1784132)
If I assume women like me, but I'm not getting laid, then I have only myself to blame, and that doesn't feel good. But my pride isn't so attached to the amount of gay sex I'm having.
Web companies are quite different from screenplays.
Did you create this comment exclusively for the love of creating a comment?
Re:A sick CEO's full disclosure on Monday October 11, 2010 @04:25AM (#1779159)
You get your customers and colleagues only once, too. Maybe he could have chosen better priorities. At least he had some.
Re:Ask HN: Please help a virgin blogger. on Thursday September 30, 2010 @01:45PM (#1744139)
I'd been reading your site for a few weeks before I realized they were recycled comments. I like the idea of culling the ones that read like little essays. I just assumed that was your goal.

Plus, having a blog on its own domain is easier than giving everyone a link to http://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=edw519, which is awkward, and which includes the clutter of shorter comments, other people's comments, up/down arrows, etc.

1. When I read, I'm interested in an author, not an author's readers. (But the links back to HN are good in case I want that.) As in the last paragraph of this article: http://daringfireball.net/2010/06/whats_fair

2+3. I prefer reading one post at a time, with a straightforward ToC. Tags are distracting. If I'm looking for a post on a certain topic, I use a search engine.

4. Even if the title's lame at first, it can become cool if comes to stand for something good.

Re:Scotch as a Diet Hack on Friday September 03, 2010 @10:18AM (#1659628)
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think “I know, I'll use regular expressions.” Now they have two problems.
Re:Scotch as a Diet Hack on Friday September 03, 2010 @10:07AM (#1659590)
The point of this article seems to be: people believe scotch has more alcohol than it does, so you can drink less without their pressuring you into drinking more.

Obviously you could just have a water

This is more about hacking other people than it is about diet. Managing other people's impressions of you without having to be upfront about what you're doing.

Older »