gaalze

So you are saying a naive implementation on a single core is showing that people are prematurely scaling graph processing?

Yeah I should have actually read that poorly written jails fud. My b.

The best alternative: http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/

Jails aren't that great: https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/13/freebsd-jails-...

But there is Capsicum too: http://lwn.net/Articles/482858/

Go with GS.

Microsoft/Google will have you drinking Kool-Aid and you'll be pushing their shit.

If you go into GS you will learn a lot more about finance and that's important, you can take that knowledge and move to a corporation that uses a better language like Haskell or Ocaml, or find some open minded people who will let you use a better language inside GS.

At Microsoft/Google you are stuck with .Net/C++ or something like Go which was designed by an idiot who forgot about incremental compilation. Also they are offering you less, so they can go fuck themselves.

can anyone remember the link for a site that showed how it would make parens long enough (horizontally) to cover each part of a definition?

funny is what you make it. absurd, depressing, uplifting, idiotic.

I consider this the best comedy on the planet: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2396224/

I also like the stuff by this guy brad neely: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WCiBPjckTg

don't let other people tell you what's funny or you'll be watching carlos mencia and everybody loves raymond.

Make it funny:

http://learnyouahaskell.com/

http://learnyousomeerlang.com/

http://learnyouanagda.liamoc.net/

http://landoflisp.com/

http://realmofracket.com/about.html

don't skimp on the cool simulation stuff!

It's fast because of dependency analysis. They forgot about something called incremental compilation.

This is what they should have spent their 20% on: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/IncrementalCompiler

how does go compile so quickly? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2976630/why-does-go-compi...

because they fucking forgot incremental compilation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incremental_compiler

I think that gasnet neural networks that took into account the locally inhibitive? impact of nitrous oxide are far superior to traditional ANN. But I just read that recently, so maybe misunderstood that.

How will this impact research into artificial neural nets?

Please don't have an opinion when posting on StackExchange. Democracy and committees are what make America great and why we chose XML over S-Expressions.

How does this compare to reversible debugging in GDB? I guess it addresses the increased overhead (some say 1000x) that UndoDB tries to fix.

Is this is an argument for js? I don't understand.

Well if I'm going by the youtube binaural beats I might as well buy crystals and magnetic bands for my wrists.

Is there a .edu with a binaural beats mp3?

Could you recommend a pdf or mp3 specifically? I'm really looking for an mp3 to put on repeat.

There's also Javelin: https://github.com/tailrecursion/javelin

which à la 'Simpsons already did it' rule:

http://www.cliki.net/cells

I'm certainly not the author, I'm just desperate to see more people working on something to compete with Elm! I've just never been a fan of Haskell syntax :(

I thought this was interesting:

~/src/elm-package$ cloc . => 2399

~/src/zelkova$ cloc . => 392

---

Also here are two demos:

#1. Mario!

http://jamesmacaulay.github.io/zelkova/examples/mario/

https://github.com/jamesmacaulay/zelkova/blob/gh-pages/examp...

#2. Dragging boxes

http://jamesmacaulay.github.io/zelkova/examples/drag-and-dro...

https://github.com/jamesmacaulay/zelkova/blob/gh-pages/examp...

Anyone got an opinion?