News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

fuelfive

Re:Architectural Cross-Section of Kowloon Walled City on Wednesday July 03, 2024 @05:21PM (#40870119)
Thanks for writing Glider! I adored that game as a kid and was part of how the possibilities of computing began to captivate my attention.
Re:Do Not Build SaaS on Tuesday January 02, 2024 @10:55PM (#38850539)
Back when Elon started PayPal, SaaS was the frontier!
Re:Extreme Parkour with Legged Robots on Monday October 09, 2023 @03:55PM (#37824693)
Glad to see our universities making progress in this important area of national security.
By this logic, the title would be equally correct if they wrote "Jimmy Buffet Dies After Cruise Robotaxi Blocked Ambulance"
Re:Silicon Valley’s Exclusive Salary Database on Sunday July 01, 2018 @03:47PM (#17437198)
It seems weird that Wired focuses on the negative edge case here. At Vicarious we use OptionImpact to make sure everyone is paid fairly, and I imagine that's the vast majority of users. Deceiving someone into taking a lowball salary is a very shortsighted way to run a business, and I have trouble believing any well-run company actually does this.
We talked about releasing more comprehensive proof of concept code, but ultimately decided against it. While helpful for other researchers, offering anyone on the internet a ready-to-use arbitrary captcha breaker seemed like a net-negative for society.
Re:Vicarious AI raises another $50M on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @09:50PM (#14853232)
There are a few papers up on the site already and some more coming. As a business, publications aren't really the KPIs we prioritize (vs an academic-style lab like DM or OAI).
Re:General Game Playing with Schema Networks on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @01:48PM (#14554514)
Here's a link to the paper as well (ICML 2017 preprint)

https://www.vicarious.com/img/icml2017-schemas.pdf

Some additional results on other games in the blog post:

https://www.vicarious.com/general-game-playing-with-schema-n...

Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (September 2015) on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @01:17PM (#10154059)
Re:Large Scale Deep Learning – Jeff Dean [pdf] on Tuesday December 09, 2014 @01:44PM (#8724723)
These are great highlights, although your second point from [1] is a bit misleading. Humans have a 5% error rate because the average person can't differentiate between 150 different breeds of dogs and other similar nonsense.
Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (November 2014) on Saturday November 01, 2014 @12:16PM (#8543551)
Vicarious - Silicon Valley, CA.

        /\ \
       /  \ \
      / /\ \ \
     / / /\ \ \
    / / /__\_\ \ 
   / / /________\
   \/___________|
Our long term goal is to build machines that exceed human intelligence. We are passionate about changing the world with science and software, and we are looking for exceptional people to join us in that mission.

Available roles:

  - Machine Learning Researcher
  - Computer Vision Researcher
  - Software Engineer 
  - DevOps
  - Systems Administrator.
We have raised ~$70M in funding and are not constrained by publication, grant applications, or product development cycles. At Vicarious, there is room to develop new approaches that would otherwise not be supported in academia or industry. In the long term, our work will push forward the AI and robotics revolutions.

Learn more: http://vicarious.com/

When was the first Macintosh computer released?

1467 B.C.

Needs some work...

This is a very long video. What was nice in it? Can you give some highlights?
Digging in to the journal article, the technique they use can only scale to captchas with 8 characters or less, so having a longer word is a simple fix.
Re:Ask HN: Where are the hard programming challenges/jobs? on Saturday March 02, 2013 @01:01PM (#5310318)
We work on hard stuff (http://vicarious.com/) and we're always looking for exceptional people
Re:Show HN: Slidescroll – view your slide decks together on Friday February 08, 2013 @01:15PM (#5189256)
Ha, nice demo presentation.

One minor piece of feedback: add slide number out of total below the slide.

Re:Scientists See Promise in Deep-Learning Programs on Sunday November 25, 2012 @08:13PM (#4829926)
We think so (http://vicarious.com/), but we are obviously biased.
IIRC, the reasons were:

- Depending on how you read it, Last Invention can sound really ominous.

- LI is a bit of a mouthful to say, whereas Vicarious is a single word

- People generally responded better to Vicarious as a name when we asked around

Never heard of The Last One...

We seriously considered Last Invention as an alternative name, and actually still own lastinvention.com. For a bunch of reasons, we decided on Vicarious instead. :)
Unfortunately, this attack does nothing to advance the state of the art in OCR (or audio recognition). It's basically the same story as every other CAPTCHA attack to date: take advantage of some accidental statistical regularity in the generation function. As soon as this kind of flaw is discovered, it only takes a few hours for the generation code to be patched in such a way that completely prevents this sort of attack from working.

Older »