News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

frogulis

Amusing how similar our comments are :) though yours is better, I think.
> English verse rhymes

That is not universally true at all. For example, Milton's Paradise Lost, or much of Shakespeare. There are countless other examples of blank verse in English.

Re:Diamond Transistor on Monday October 26, 2026 @08:21PM (#50253115)
Can you elaborate? Sounds cool
Oh good, you responded! I'm aware roughly of the history of thorn, but I was specifically wondering about it being used only once rather than on all the instances of "th", or at least all the instances if "the".
Re:Why is every rationalist blog post way too long? on Wednesday October 14, 2026 @07:43AM (#50086113)
Yeah. It's titled "a love song to nicotine" and 80+% of it is about the benefits of nicotine with a claim that "sublingual nicotine’s addictive potential feels low", but TFA links to the tacked-on twitter screenshots at the end. Not the point, but it does make one wonder. Though, to be fair, I only realised that the main body of the article existed when I accidentally scrolled back up "too far". Perhaps the author of TFA received the exact same link and made the same mistake as I initially did.
Not really relevant, but I have to ask: why did you only use letter þ once in your comment?
Re:Mallet Head Angle on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @08:12PM (#50000474)
That's a good rule. I came across this article as I'm building a mallet at the moment (with a head made of a piece of old river red gum firewood, because I guess I love sharpening tools).

The mallet has shifted to be my current project because I need to source more materials for my workbench made of secondhand 2x4s.

The project where I actually make an end product is depending on the workbench, because building an instrument on my current crappy workbench sounds torturous.

Can't say I'm unhappy about any of this, though :)

Re:Example.com Just Launched the Biggest Redesign in Decades on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @02:54AM (#49975111)
Yeah apologies, bad wording on my part. I really just meant the removal of the opening line which made it clear that it was a correspondence: "I am happy to try and answer any questions you have."
Re:Example.com Just Launched the Biggest Redesign in Decades on Monday October 05, 2026 @11:16PM (#49973734)
And the "statement" in this article is the text from that email, disingenuously edited. I'm not sure why, but it rubs me the wrong way.
Re:XCancel Taken Down Again on Monday September 14, 2026 @06:39AM (#49694705)
I think this changed recently, but at least prior to that, when not logged in, you only saw the initial post and none of the replies.
Re:Intellectual Fly Is Open on Sunday September 06, 2026 @08:55AM (#49586118)
I believe HN does some automated editing of titles to avoid clickbaity titles being displayed. May be that.
Re:Fastpotify on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @06:36AM (#49520152)
RRR and PBS in Melbourne both stream online and are both fantastic for music discovery. Go the former if you lean indie and the latter if you lean international.
Re:Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code on Monday August 10, 2026 @02:55AM (#49240213)
To be clear, I'm not accusing Anthropic of being evil black hats trying to break my computer, I'm accusing (or rather suspecting) them of pushing me towards some kind of product lock-in by making my preferred "sceptical at-arms-length user" workflow more annoying.
Re:Auto mode is now the default in Claude Code on Monday August 10, 2026 @01:25AM (#49239523)
Their findings about auto mode catching more dangerous commands, and most permission requests being accepted without scrutiny is interesting. I can totally see how that happens.

On the other hand, soooo many of the tool uses it asks permission for are custom commands to replace functionality I should be able to trust once instead. e.g. instead of having a trustable Find tool, or using its already-trusted Read tool, it often will run `find` or `grep` or `cat` with a series of pipes and substitutions or `-exec` args, requiring me to give permission every time for basic, safe operations.

The (increasingly active) conspiracy theorist inside of me says it's precisely designed to do that, to give me "permission fatigue", so I turn on auto mode and give myself over to the machine spirit :)

Your "tilting at the windmill" phrasing is interesting. I don't get the sense from your tone otherwise that you disapprove of it or think it's pointless.
This explosion of optionality types is (the most important) topic of Rich Hickey's "Maybe Not" talk. I recommend it!

The short version is: the shape of a type is inherent to the type itself, but the optionality of its members is dependent on the situation. A type system that solves this problem separates these concepts to allow for this distinction.

I _suspect_ it's possible to implement something like that in typescript but I haven't tried it myself (and I doubt it's very ergonomic).

Perhaps the beginning of a new vowel harmony phenomenon in English
Re:Dostoyevsky Isn't Difficult on Wednesday June 24, 2026 @11:31PM (#48668500)
Wonderful to see Durak mentioned. I learned it in its Vietnamese form (Tấn) and introduced it to friends in Australia where it was a big hit. We eventually settled on calling it "Dickhead" or "Dumbarse" which seems like an appropriately Australian interpretation of the source material :thinking:
Re:Developers don't understand CORS (2019) on Saturday June 20, 2026 @11:23PM (#48615385)
From my experience, the reason CORS is hard to understand is that it's somehow inverted from the default "shape" of security in web dev.

We easily form the intuition of the client being a by-default untrusted entity, and checking whether it has the privilege of accessing this data, where the server is the arbiter of that access.

CORS is so inherently different to that, and while the information is easily available, it requires a short but careful read to grok the idea -- which a dev tunnel-visioning towards getting their application code written may not wish to slow down for.

Re:Write for One Person on Sunday June 14, 2026 @10:46PM (#48535991)
Went looking for that article out of curiosity. For what it's worth, I think the original commenter expressed a fair opinion politely, but the "author has issues" commenter was unnecessarily unpleasant. Neither of those should prevent you from writing how you want!
Re:The Melancholy of Slaying Monsters on Wednesday May 27, 2026 @08:57AM (#48293573)
If you've got the ability to play the original, it still held up fantastically when I last played it properly (2-odd years ago).

I tried emulating it a few years before that when I didn't have any workable screen for my PS2 and that was not so good. A game that pushed the original hardware to its limit also pushed the emulator past its limit. Might be better with more powerful hardware than mine?

However, I've heard the remake is perfectly good, and surely easier to play with modern PC hardware!

I wrote a response to this, but then I realised I was responding to the claim that modern media was more derivative, rather than what you actually said, which was that modern media is more _meta_.

Can you go into that a little more? Do you have specific examples that make you sad?

The first example that comes to my mind is the show Community, which I really enjoy, and which doesn't make me sad at all.

P.S. an article I linked to in my original response was https://www.filfre.net/2025/01/the-crpg-renaissance-part-1-f... which I mentioned as it talks about a historical standout in the genre but puts it in the context of the copycats and the schlock. It's now irrelevant to my comment, but I'd like to link to it anyway.

Re:Haskell Foundation 2026 Update on Thursday May 21, 2026 @03:17AM (#48219030)
> Deployment is pain specially on commodity VPS.

Oh? Why is that?

Older »