freddyym

It would appear that you suffer from acute privacy nihilism [0].

[0] https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/08/the-a...

Privacy Guides | https://www.privacyguides.org/ | Remote | Full Time

Privacy Guides is a socially motivated website that provides information for protecting your data security and privacy. We are a non-profit project with a mission to inform the public about the value of digital privacy, and about global government initiatives which aim to monitor your online activity. Our website is free of advertisements and not affiliated with any of the listed providers.

We have a small, remote team of privacy researchers and advocates working to further our mission of protecting free expression and promoting privacy-respecting technology. As a non-profit, we are expanding very slowly to ensure the project is sustainable in the long term.

Interested in making people more private online? Have a look at our open roles:

- Content Creator

- Journalist

- Intern - Community/News

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/about/jobs/

And also an archived one. Large portions of the list are out of date and, in some cases, frankly unsafe. Moreover, the notion of degoogling is misguided: privacy should be the aim, not eradicating Google.

From the article:

> Yes, I understand that Wilbur also sued people. I’m not claiming that he was a good person. My point is that in a humane world, no part of this story would even be possible.

Great story related to a great show, thanks for sharing!

It's admirable elegant variation. [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elegant_variation