News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

foxit

Re:I would prefer to pay for Twitter on Saturday May 03, 2014 @02:15PM (#7691795)
>(By the way, if significant portions of your userbase are capable of becoming addicted to your product, consider that it may not be fully ethical to produce it.)

Well, there goes the gaming industry.

Re:The Sharp Dropoff In Worker Happiness on Tuesday May 01, 2012 @01:58AM (#3913227)
There is a reason that long stretches of unemployment, accidents, and tragedies lead to divorce. It isn't because compassion is the default reaction to stress in most families.
Our experience with Wimdu: we found out about the site well before we found out who the Samwer brothers are and what they do (namely, rip off big sites). We accordingly signed up because hey, more exposure can't be a bad thing, right?

Wimdu failed to cross-check our presence when they gave their telemarketing list to what sounded like kids in dorm rooms robocalling us - day after day after day and sometimes three times per day - until they finally gave up (more likely) or finally got the message that we had already listed ourselves on their site. Whatever Airbnb did where they emailed people via Craigslist has absolutely nothing on the obnoxiousness of Wimdu, they're just lesser news.

Some good suggestions here.

I've considered this issue a lot. Having lost many friends and family members to cancers of various types, and counting cancer survivors among my friends and acquaintances, I am very keenly interested in curing cancer.

Right now, being so deeply invested in my own business, I would wish there were things I could do to simply fund cancer research. But nothing is simple, and there are a lot of problems with cancer research funding: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/health/research/28cancer.h... The comment on that piece that most struck me was from the breast cancer survivor who eagerly participated in a research study, given that she knew which carcinogens she'd been exposed to in her lifetime, but found that she was asked useless questions using research money that could've been well-used elsewhere. #28 on this page: http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2009/0...

You will quickly find when you research cancer that acquiring a decade's worth of specialized knowledge isn't going to get you to your goal. It's much better to have a working knowledge of statistics and the ability to read medical papers, something you can do with far less than a MD or PhD.

Re:Cube - A Game About Google Maps on Saturday April 28, 2012 @10:07PM (#3904847)
This being the top comment, I'm assuming it got upvoted the most, but nobody chimed in verbal agreement.

I'm posting from a 2007 Compaq 8510p with Windows XP, and having the browser bog down as if I've been hacked has been the sharpest reminder of late I need to upgrade.

Re:We Are The Porn Generation on Saturday April 28, 2012 @09:39PM (#3904797)
By far the biggest movement in porn since the internet is 'amateur'.

That's because the internet has stripped profits away. It's like reality shows being the trend in television because expensive productions don't have as much profit margin as they used to.

My view of porn is essentially what Naomi Wolfe's was in 2003: http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/trends/n_9437/

The only thing I'd add is that as we become more saturated in stimulation, it takes more extremes to get the dopamine hit. This goes for porn or anything else he mentions in his article.

Re:How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes on Saturday April 28, 2012 @05:57PM (#3904240)
It's simple, but there are a lot of people who do not understand this. They don't realize the taxes from the system that funded childhood educations and college tuitions to result in an employable, knowledgeable, creative mass of first-world dwellers should be paid back into through taxes on the profits of the companies in their sphere.

There is a singular lack of realization about the societies in which we live, possibly because it does feel like every man for himself most days. The societal web that makes us interdependent and upon which we rely without knowing it isn't as apparent.

Addendum: there's a lot of confusion about the differences between something being legal and something being moral/ethical in the responses to this post. Legal too often simply means exploiting loopholes.

Re:How Stripe thinks about recruiting on Saturday April 28, 2012 @03:07PM (#3903749)
As the gp says - silence is NOT acceptable. A form courtesy email with the word unfortunately appearing somewhere in it is the bare minimum.
Re:At 92, Movie Bootlegger Is Soldiers’ Hero on Saturday April 28, 2012 @12:28AM (#3902040)
I think this is the first time I've upvoted a joke at HN.
Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Saturday April 28, 2012 @12:22AM (#3902031)
Ha. I see they've gotten around it temporarily by changing the link to airbedandbreakfast.com, as in this ad:

http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/vac/2983382098.html

Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Friday April 27, 2012 @03:48PM (#3900750)
What in the world was this downvoted for. Seriously. I was explaining a misunderstanding.

For those who don't know, Airbnb has a posting-to-Craigslist option. It is not an auto-poster; rather, it formats a post into the html that'll be accepted by Craigslist, then you have to log into your Craigslist account to post to Craigslist what Airbnb's given you. We haven't used this option since we started. It does invite you to go to Airbnb's site so the transaction is not being conducted via Craigslist's email system. It chooses "no email - see below" as the default option and does not include a phone number. You can, of course, since you are the poster and it's not being auto-posted, change anything and everything about the format and the options.

Then you have our situation, the situation that has developed. We indicate our reviews on Airbnb and other services. The other services remain fine and untouched. But we can no longer show potential customers our Airbnb reviews.

Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Friday April 27, 2012 @03:47PM (#3900743)
I post ads every single day of the week. This is the first occurrence of the term being blocked.
Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Friday April 27, 2012 @03:22AM (#3897993)
To whomever is downvoting everything I am posting, tell me why.

I think this is REALLY important. I didn't want it to pass without notice as when I posted the "Airbnb killer" link 10 days ago; that was worth noting too, but this is vital. Ability to link to Airbnb on Craigslist may not be important in the large markets where people will see your Airbnb ad anyway, as in SeoxyS's case, but for the just-getting-going places where Airbnb wishes to grow, it's vital.

Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Friday April 27, 2012 @03:10AM (#3897966)
I think he's referring to what jeremydavid posted above: http://davegooden.com/2011/05/how-airbnb-became-a-billion-do...

It's an inaccurate representation of what happened as well as a year-old story, and I don't think it has much relevance to why they chose to block airbnb.com today.

Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Friday April 27, 2012 @03:06AM (#3897955)
This isn't about them allowing postings via airbnb, but rather not allowing the string "airbnb.com" to appear in the ad.
Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Friday April 27, 2012 @03:02AM (#3897946)
I operate vacation rentals and my family makes part of our living through Airbnb, and thus have an interest in their continued growth and success as a company.
Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Friday April 27, 2012 @03:01AM (#3897944)
1. You have a prime SF location and your fantastic reviews will always get you a high place in Airbnb's listings. SF and NY have enormous exposure. Enough people coming to town a) need an alternative to high hotel prices and b) are aware of the existence of a site called Airbnb that you will never run short of guests.

2. We don't use the Craigslist posting feature through Airbnb's site. It would make some sense for Craigslist to limit the use of that tool, since they have limited the use of other automated tools (limiting their own utility as a service, but that's beyond the scope of what I'm talking about). This is not being able to type "airbnb.com" into the posting form at all, something quite different. Potential guests ask for reviews, as they should, and we direct them upfront in our Craigslist ads to Airbnb, Homeaway, and other places we have excellent reviews.

Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Thursday April 26, 2012 @11:41PM (#3897406)
I hope this submission gets noticed. Craigslist is the absolute best way to advertise Airbnb listings. Without it, we're kinda sunk, and it could have a big impact on Airbnb's bottom line.
Re:Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com on Thursday April 26, 2012 @11:33PM (#3897381)

Craigslist blocking Airbnb.com

http://i.imgur.com/ILEyc.jpgWhile updating our ads today, this is what appeared on the screen. We can't submit an ad that contains airbnb.com. No explanation why.

( Read More... | 38 comments | 50 points | on HN )
Older Amazon.com screengrabs can be found here: http://www.kokogiak.com/gedankengang/2004/07/amazoncom-logo-...
Since it doesn't appear anywhere in the headline, this is for CasaHop (http://www.casahop.com)

Just for the record, I DO NOT agree with the headline in any way, shape, or form. House swapping and vacation rental swapping has existed since before the internet, and while adding social networking to the transaction is a nice touch and may even work to make a viable business, I can't see how this kills Airbnb, or even competes with it.

[edit] disclosure: vacation rental owner advertising on Airbnb and other vacation rental sites, has never worked out to successfully swap houses with the 5-10 parties who've inquired over time.

Re:“She doesn’t deserve to be alive” on Monday April 09, 2012 @09:04PM (#3820167)
Oh yeah, the Sagan thing. I was thinking more about the Voyager picture.

I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Sagan requested that Voyager turn and take the picture as it exited the solar system, which is the reason we have it. I'd say his 1994 book and the original photo are pretty well intertwined.

His conclusion went a step further than yours: since we're insignificant, we must take care of each other and the planet, because we're all we have.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot#Reflections_by_Sa...

Whereas stopping with just "we're insignificant, so who cares" is apathy, the most destructive force.

Re:Poll: What is your primary operating system on Tuesday April 03, 2012 @12:00PM (#3793454)
I'm using "messing" in the same sense the gp used "mucking":

Ubuntu was soooo close to surpassing Windows from a "I just want to get stuff done without mucking with the machine" standpoint.

Older »