forgottenlogin9

You are advocating for “mob rule”. History is replete with examples of this being a bad idea.

What if a buyer wants to lease the product under the seller’s terms. Should it not be their right to enter that agreement?

The concept of rights is not binary, but at a certain point there cannot be multiple conflicting “rights” — 1 must get preference.

The maker starts with a right to make a product as they see best. The buyer has a right to purchase or not. The “public’s” rights are an interesting concept.

Where do your rights begin and another’s end? If they wish to build a product in a way that you dislike, does it not impede their rights for you to inflict your will on them against their wishes?

I’ve never tried their mail-order pizza, but Pequods is very tasty.

https://www.goldbelly.com/pequods-pizza

1) California employment is at-will, employees can always be fired.

2) What on earth does this have to do with running payroll late?

And if there is a bug in the logic that determines if it can or can’t work?

If that is insane, you may not have issue with this specific line but you surely have issue with the 2 “insane” lines that follow it?