fisheuler

Location: China

Remote: Remote Only

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Java,Python,Linux,Spark,TypeScript,Azure,AWS,Distriubted System

Resume/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/zhaoliang-guo/ | reach out for detail info

Email:[email protected]

Background: 10+ years, mainly do internet scale backend system developments, also some big data projects, current building AI system to do prod trouble shooting automation works.

This is ridiculos, think about that, will Debian project survive without a Linux kernel written with the help of LLM tools?

We have a very top level strategy design and plan to make safety of our energy supply chains, I can even tell that in my hometwon we also designed and implementated a Pumped-storage hydroelectricity power station in the inner part of China.

Also suggest a very good book which details our past decades hard work on energy saftey design: 筚路蓝缕 世纪工程决策建设记述 (Blazing a Trail: How China Decided and Built Its "Projects of the Century")

Book Link: https://book.douban.com/subject/30348776/ 9 out of 10 score for this book.

Zhuang Zhou(BC 369-BC 286) have said the similar things "窃钩者诛,窃国者侯" This phrase comes from the chapter Ransacking Coffers (Qu Qie, 胠箧) in the Daoist text Zhuangzi (4th century BC).

赞一个

smells like game of thrones.

CHM(computer history museum) have conducted an oral history interview with TSMC found Morris Chang in 2007. Chang told his personal Odyssey in this interview, from inner China to Taiwan, studying and working at US, PhD application refused by MIT, but luckily he choose a fast rocket track in the industry, after he accumulated enough wealth, industry insight, connections etc... He returned to Taiwan to found TMSC, else is the story. Also he compared Asian and American engineering styles:

"I think the Asian engineers tend to be more methodical, they tend to be more studious, more orderly engineers; whereas, the U.S. engineers tend to be more innovative, but they tend not to be as methodical and orderly as the Asian engineers. ......

On the other hand, I also think that one group can accompany another group, you know. You can have an innovative group but not so methodical and so on, and then you can have a methodical group maybe not very innovative accompanying each other. "

https://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/20...