finnish-food
Are you ready? Put on your “serious hat”!
(God this website is infantile in how you have to coerce the audience into being adults)
Animals and pets are not important. No, I know, I know; society is breaking down and instead of fixing it it’s better to have a slave who is fully dependent on us and yet can only minimally respond while having the intellectual capabilities of a 3 year old (at best) to attend to the animal slave owner.
This is a big concern! Why!?
I strongly feel that it’s only a concern because the kind of person so fully invested in an Animal as opposed to other humans in society has fully accepted and is attempting to encourage the total breakdown of society.
No, it’s not about pets, it’s about the total amount of economic force placed into mere animals.
But we aren’t ready to be serious, I am sure. No one wants to engage, be substantiative, or even say “Wow Finnish-food I disagree with your point and here is why!”
I am going to give up hope on life soon.
Your fault.
That is right. Is saying it in big words somehow more confusing for you?
Basically Jacobi identity would be about things like disambiguations on Wikipedia so again… are you just intimidated by words you don’t know or something? That makes me sad for you.
Also your “mind map” example is a pop psychology person’s stupid use of the mathematics term.
I guess if you think it recommending you “MegaShark vs. Giant Octopus Cat”… because you liked Jaws is helpful? I think personally it is not.
Just fool the normal people into a better UX.
Shows like Star Trek, The Outer Limits, Twilight Zone, etc. which would question or discuss complex ideas without turning them into soap operas or basic dramas.
The only shows that I can think of like that now are Black Mirror or perhaps your odd HBO offering, but those are not shining examples, and often, even if they do discuss or engage with deeper concepts or ideas, it’s not handled in a way that allows for nuance. (Black Mirror is happy to be quite crass at moments, same with HBO and other “top-tier” shows.)
If you actually lived in a Golden Era entertainment would be free, quality, and meant to enrich the people instead of advertise and moralize to them.
I really don’t understand how a DVD collection is an “essential service” either. Or why you would effectively choose not to look at your watching statistics and then simply buy the media you watch the most.
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/134503468553
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/285243804109
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/145050977289
Why not just buy what you like?
It seems you’re making a https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_(mathematics) which isn’t dimensional in any nature. It’s like saying that hacker news is a “2d forum”…
Anyway ordering it more like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_set
Just seems natural to me. Information typically isn’t hierarchal outside of artificial structures.