fghorow
LLMs appear to be able help me get through that. I'll take the help.
BUT JEEZ! Dealing with "Rain Man"[1] LLMs week-in and week-out is wildly annoying, frustrating, and anger inducing.
If they all would just STOP sounding so authoritative when spewing nonsense!
[1] After the Dustin Hoffman character in the movie of the same name. "Ah but you know I'm an excellent d̴r̴i̴v̴e̴r̴ programmer."
It happens to be right next to the DOE sponsored Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE [1]) site that established the temperature and ability to create permeability at depth using EGS.
There are (at the very least) 2 reasonable places I can think of off the top of my head in which to look around for answers -- both are organizations that run annual meetings on the topic of geothermal energy.
One is the Geothermal Rising professional organization [1]. There is a claim on the website that the papers from the annual meeting (roughly a month back) are available for free download by anybody. I can't find the actual head-link for those papers. A search engine is your friend. (I would not trust an LLM for this particular job.)
A second one is the Stanford Geothermal Workshop [2]. That is also an annual meeting. Again, use a search engine.
Sorry to not be more helpful, but this is a pretty large topic.
[1] https://www.geothermal.org/2026-geothermal-rising-conference... [2] https://geothermal.stanford.edu/events/workshop/past-proceed...
This is a very brief, high-level overview. It weirdly dives deep into some less-relevant topics and glosses over a LOT of things.
It is not irrelevant, but not terribly reliable either. The "Mathematics" in the title is self-evidently clickbait.
YMMV.
The only possible second-or-third order effect of red cross-traffic arrows is to decrease the downstream traffic on the cross road. Mostly, the places where I encounter them have a low traffic cross road. IMHO, in those situations, red cross-traffic arrows are simply a failed "traffic engineering fad".
(Edited to fix a typo and generalize "red left-arrow" to "red cross-traffic arrow" to account for left-side-of-the-road driving systems.)
I need it yesterday!
(At the moment, I'm using the OSS version of headroom. That was a real PITA to configure for local-only, but I think it is working reasonably well now.)
Cliff Compaction though???
(Edited to add: I forgot! ZFS on root available from the installer -- encrypted even if that's your jam.)
I've recently been exploring tools like headroom to help manage context, with some limited "success" (for some definition of success). What do others with similar setups do?
(I kind of hate to abandon Claude Code, as it seems to be the most capable coding assistant of the limited set of tools I've tried. But that horrendous context bloat is really painful!)
Dwarf Star Support for DeepSeek 4.1 Flash on MBPro 128GB
Antirez just landed a commit[1] to the github repo for DwarfStar that adds support for his heavily quantized variant of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.He claims it runs with SSD streaming on a macbook pro M5-Max 128 GB laptop. The code was just checked in literally hours ago, so take YMMV quite literally.[1] https://github.com/antirez/ds4/commit/bd66c402070042bf0a79ad6ece8242de4c93680c
Navier–Stokes, AI and the future of research in mathematics [pdf]
Also, I just found this (total hack, but cool)! [1]
I'm also wondering about the feasibility of taking these gizmos on airplanes, what with the Lithium battery packs, etc.
What we really need (for some definition of need) is a robot-filter-remover, timed to deal with the two critical times (first and last instant of totality; 2nd and 3rd contacts from memory). Anybody out there interested in building something like that? It would be purely a passion project, because it could only be used a few times a decade...
That was the right thing to do!
But removing the solar filter right at the moment of totality is such an edge case (both for the software and my wetware which was kind of overwhelmed) that I wonder how others dealt with it?
The ab-chiller is likely best known these days as the "propane fridge" in RVs.
Sadly, the only online resources for Cowan's work I can find are either Scribd paywalled [1], the entire book in which Cowan's piece is a chapter on the Internet Archive [2] or a pointer-to-a-pointer from a piece in the Guardian [3] to a boingboing piece [4] that seems to be offline.
(Background: I work in Direct-Use geothermal. Such ad/absorption chillers are one major tool in the toolbox for low-T cases where it is uneconomical to turn geothermal heat into electrical energy -- mostly due to Carnot's Law considerations.)
[1] https://www.scribd.com/document/527479452/Cowan-How-the-refr...
[2] https://archive.org/details/socialshapingoft0000unse_g5b0
[3] https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2014/f...
[4] https://boingboing.net/2012/08/20/how-the-refrigerator-got-i...
The union of a lot of necessary conditions is not a sufficient condition. But it might be good enough for software.
One obvious thing is that the memory requirements for this are substantially smaller than DwarfStar-- which AFAIK can only start to be used at 64GB ram and upwards. Another obvious thing is that antirez is pretty obsessed with making sure that DwarfStar passes all of DeepSeek V4 Flash's generating tests (loosely). I suspect that is also true of DwarfStar's implementation of GLM5.2, but I don't use that.
(Edited to add: there are several examples of public swimming pools being heated with Low T geothermal heat in the Perth metropolitan region of Western Australia.)
A lot of the thermal energy is not used for electrical generation. Although a small portion actually is -- made possible by the \Delta T rejecting heat at a low annual average atmospheric T.
Most of the rest of the heat is used to run an absorption chiller to maintain the ice "palace" in the summer.
(This info might be slightly outdated. It was true about 2018 or thereabouts when I met the owner of the resort at a geothermal conference.)