News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

fedotovcorp

Thanks! Did you try it? Can you share your feedback is this API useful for your goals?

What is the best way to protect machine identity (IoT device ID)?

Hi, everyone. What are the best approaches to make a secure inter-device connection? As I get they both needs have Machine ID that binds with Initial Device Identifier (IDevID) or Locally Significant Device Identifiers (LDevIDs) through digital SSL/TLS certificates. Is it enough for protection against MITM attacks?

( Read More... | no comments | 3 points | on HN )
Re:Can we merge Certificate Transparency with blockchain? on Wednesday January 23, 2019 @05:40AM (#18977182)
> Running a permissioned blockchain is nontrivial.

You are right. It's needed a relevant BFT protocol, a lot of work with masternodes community and smart economic system inside. You can look at an example of a such protocol: https://github.com/Remmeauth/remme-core/tree/dev

Re:Can we merge Certificate Transparency with blockchain? on Tuesday January 22, 2019 @06:57AM (#18967634)
Thanks for the references! The main issue isn't the support and maintenance of a such distributed network, but its integration with current solutions and avoiding centralized middleware services that will weaken the schema described in the documents.
You are right. There are a lot such ideas of implementations for DNS, CA level etc. For authentication, there are also field to try it, but of course, blockchain isn't a solution that would fit everywhere.
The answer about the auth process with current protocol was written above.
It depends on how you estimate CA vulnerability and how much your organization ready to trust it. There are enough cases when important auth info was leaked.
We understand your pain related to difficulties to get started with blockchain protocols. One of our goals actually makes it as easy as possible to interact with. Unfortunately, the time that we invest in such adaptation isn't enough, but we have tight terms for our roadmap realization.
Why does user need to hand over its private key? It obviously breaks the security policy.

Older »