eulerian

I think this comment is a bit hyperbolic - it's really not so bad. Sure, we need to be mindful about accessibility in our rollout of useful technology. But I think the advantages that technologies, including the ones you listed above, bring into our lives far significantly outweigh whatever you are complaining about.

To your points specifically, I mostly see that you are complaining about technology you were previously used to (RFID cards, parking payment systems, public transit, school management systems, etc.) being replaced by more advanced technology (QR codes, 2FA, etc.). So, I don't see the problem as decoupling technology from lives but as enabling a smoother transition to more reliable and advanced technology.

The article makes other points about addiction, etc., and this is a problem that is not innate to technology but to human behavior that is exploited (knowingly or unknowingly) by profit-driven companies. Targeting the technology itself in this situation, again, is being lazy in my opinion.

> people should be able make their own choice

Is anyone currently being forced to use any technology?

The cynic in me finds it hypocritical for this article to be published on the internet (major technological feat).

Humans’ abilities to solve math problems is independent of language – if you can (or cannot) solve a problem stated in English, and if you understand, say French, you will (or will not) be able to solve the same problem presented to you in French. The blog shows that while GPT-4o can understand base64, its math reasoning does not generalize to base64.

Probably off topic: it's the second time I am reading about phase shifts today. The first time I read it was in context of interpretability of attention in transformer neural nets where they find phase shifts between positional and semantic learning: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03902

FWIW, Amazon recently also announced AI powered code remediation (for Terraform and CloudFormation among other languages) and IaC support with CodeWhisperer as well: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-codewhisperer-offers...

Amazon CodeWhisperer offers new AI-powered code remediation, IaC support, and integration with Visual Studio.

I'm also paying them with my user data. They use this data to generate insights and make more products that make them more money. It's very easy to overlook how much you are paying through your user behaviour.

So you'd suggest something to the contrary of the article -- plan not for the end of your career but for the next few years?

Curious if there's anyone who's made a plan for this sort of a thing. I'm never able to plan even the rest of my week and follow through with it. What does a plan for your career look like and how do you get the discipline to stick to it?